The plaintiff in a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a notice with the court indic...
Summary
The plaintiff in a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a notice with the court indicating that they had provided answers to interrogatories propounded by Epstein's legal team on January 16, 2009. The notice was filed by attorneys Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill on February 13, 2009. The document is subject to a protective order.
Persons Referenced (6)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: #281849/clw
The plaintiff in a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a notice with the court indicating that they had provided answers to interrogatories propounded by Epstein's legal team on January 16, 2009. The notice was filed by attorneys Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill on February 13, 2009. The document is subject to a protective order.
Court Filing: DOJ-OGR-00015200
The Plaintiff files a notice with the court that they have furnished Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories to the attorney for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The document is certified by the Plaintiff's attorneys, Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill.
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a c...
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the additional depositions are unnecessary and duplicative. The defendant objects, citing the cumulative nature of the testimony and the burden on witnesses and counsel. The court filing provides insight into the case's procedural posture and the parties' litigation strategies.
Court Filing: 20-10495
The plaintiff's attorney, David Boies, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay discovery is unwarranted and should be denied. Boies contends that Maxwell's motion to dismiss is not strong and that the court has previously stated that dispositive motions do not typically stay discovery. The plaintiff requests that the court deny Maxwell's anticipated motion to stay discovery.
Court Filing: 23509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the additional depositions are unnecessary and duplicative. The defendant objects, citing the cumulative nature of the testimony and the burden on witnesses and counsel. The court filing provides insight into the case's procedural posture and the parties' litigation strategies.
court filing: 28509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.