Skip to content
Case File
d-1396House OversightLegal Filing

The Government responds to the defendant's request for a bill of particulars, arguing that it is not...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1396
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The Government responds to the defendant's request for a bill of particulars, arguing that it is not required to provide an exhaustive list of unnamed co-conspirators. The Government states its intention to introduce co-conspirator statements from two individuals, Jeffrey Epstein and an employee of Epstein's, and asserts that the defendant has adequate information to prepare for trial.

Tags

Government's obligation to provide discovery materialsRequest for a bill of particulars regarding co-conspiratorsIntroduction of co-conspirator statements at trial
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 38220

The Government responds to the defendant's request for a bill of particulars, arguing that it is not required to provide an exhaustive list of unnamed co-conspirators. The Government states its intention to introduce co-conspirator statements from two individuals, Jeffrey Epstein and an employee of Epstein's, and asserts that the defendant has adequate information to prepare for trial.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The Government has identified numerous bank accounts associated with the defendant, with total balan...

The Government has identified numerous bank accounts associated with the defendant, with total balances ranging from hundreds of thousands to over $20 million between 2016 and the present. The defendant has engaged in significant financial transactions, including transfers of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and has reported holding foreign bank accounts containing over a million dollars. The Government notes a significant property sale in 2016 and past financial transactions with Jeffrey Epstein.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell is weakening as her detenti...

The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell is weakening as her detention period extends, and that the government's assessment of her flight risk has increased in tandem with the diminishing strength of their case. It highlights the defendant's challenges to the indictment, including the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and statute of limitations issues. The document also alleges that government prosecutors misled a federal judge to obtain evidence against Maxwell.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document discusses the government's evidence in a criminal case, highlighting that multiple witn...

The document discusses the government's evidence in a criminal case, highlighting that multiple witnesses and documentary evidence corroborate the victims' accounts of interacting with the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein. The government argues that this evidence strongly supports the victims' testimony. The defendant has filed a motion complaining about the volume of documentary evidence produced.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is the government's omnibus memorandum in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial m...

The document is the government's omnibus memorandum in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, addressing topics such as the relevance of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, the timeliness of the indictment, and the defendant's motions to suppress evidence. The government argues that the indictment is valid and that Maxwell's motions should be denied.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court orders the Government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the...

The court orders the Government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment to the Defendant at the same time as Jencks Act materials are disclosed. The Government had previously objected to this disclosure, but the court found the objection to be untimely and unpersuasive. The court balances the risk of surprise to the Defendant against legitimate law enforcement concerns.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.