Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Federal Jeffrey Epstein Case
Summary
The passage alleges that senior U.S. Attorney Office staff (AUSA Weinstein, FAUSA Sloman, U.S. Attorney Acosta) disclosed case‑specific information and possibly offered financial inducements to witnes AUSA Weinstein allegedly disclosed plea‑negotiation details and warned a defense‑contact about media FAUSA Sloman reportedly sent non‑case‑specific information to defense, contradicting internal poli
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Potential Reopening of Jeffrey Epstein Case Highlights Secret 2007 Non‑Prosecution Deal Involving U.S. Officials
The passage details alleged violations of a 13‑year‑old federal victims‑rights law by federal prosecutors, naming U.S. Labor Secretary Alex Acosta (then U.S. Attorney) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Mari Federal prosecutors allegedly concealed a 2007 non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from U.S. Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for South Florida, is specifically mentioned
Federal prosecutors admit backing down on victim notifications in Jeffrey Epstein case after pressure from his attorneys
The passage reveals that U.S. Attorney’s Office officials altered victim‑notification procedures in 2013 due to objections from Epstein’s lawyers, suggesting possible prosecutorial misconduct and a co Federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 they altered victim‑notification obligations after pressure fro Former federal prosecutor Frances Hakes and Kenneth Staff are cited as having consulted with Epste
Letter from Kirkland & Ellis urging a de novo federal review of Jeffrey Epstein prosecution
The passage reveals internal legal strategy to challenge a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, cites a non‑prosecution agreement, and mentions a subpoena issued by Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafan Kirkland & Ellis argues the Department's prior review was limited and not de novo. Reference to a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that should have precluded further federal action. Assistant U.S. Att
Debate Over Whether Jeffrey Epstein’s Federal Non‑Prosecution Deal Violated Victims’ Rights
The passage reveals that U.S. attorneys concealed a federal non‑prosecution agreement from alleged victims and possibly violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, suggesting a potential prosecutorial mis Federal non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein kept secret from victims in 2008. U.S. attorneys sent letters to victims describing an ongoing federal investigation despite the agree Assistant U.S. At
Attorney alleges Brady violations and prosecutorial misconduct in Jeffrey Epstein case, citing ties to former President Bill Clinton
The passage provides specific allegations of withheld exculpatory evidence, potential Brady violations, and misconduct by U.S. Attorney's Office staff, directly linking Epstein's wealth and his report Claims that the USAO has not produced interview transcripts or FBI 302s for ~40 alleged witnesses. Alleged Brady‑type exculpatory evidence being withheld from the defense. Attorney asserts prosecutio
Labor Secretary Acosta and former federal prosecutor Villafafia under DOJ probe for alleged victim‑rights violations in Jeffrey Epstein plea deal
The passage identifies a sitting cabinet member (U.S. Secretary of Labor) and a senior DOJ prosecutor as subjects of a Justice Department misconduct investigation tied to a high‑profile Epstein plea b U.S. Secretary of Labor Marty Acosta was a lead prosecutor in the 2019 Epstein federal case. Former U.S. Attorney Marie Villafafia helped negotiate a plea deal that allegedly concealed victim i Judge
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.