NLRB Defends Notice‑Posting Requirement Against First Amendment and NLRA Challenges
Summary
The passage outlines legal arguments and case law supporting the National Labor Relations Board's authority to require employers to post government‑provided labor‑rights notices. It contains no new al The NLRB cites Supreme Court precedent to assert implied authority to preempt state action. Multiple labor‑policy groups argue the posting rule violates the First Amendment and NLRA Section 8( The Bo
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Doe filing alleges Prince Andrew lobbying and confidentiality deals tied to Epstein case
The passage links Prince Andrew and high‑profile attorney Alan Dershowitz to alleged lobbying and confidential plea negotiations in the Epstein matter, suggesting possible foreign‑commerce implication Jane Doe #3 alleges Prince Andrew lobbied the U.S. government for a favorable plea arrangement for J Claims that confidentiality and "blank check" provisions were negotiated in connection with Prince
Petitioners claim U.S. government failed to consult victims before non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the federal government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein without informing the victims, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officials. It pro Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstei Claim that victims were not c
Petitioners claim U.S. Government violated Crime Victims’ Rights Act by not consulting them before a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the Department of Justice negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein without victim input, suggesting possible misconduct or concealment at a high level. Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. Government failed to consult victims before an NPA with Jeffrey Epstein. The case was filed in July 2008
Alleged new investigation seeks to overturn Mike Tyson rape conviction based on juror testimonies and claims of victim credibility
The passage describes a private individual's effort to reopen a criminal case involving a former heavyweight champion. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, government agencies, or significant financ A self‑described investigator claims to have new evidence that could secure a new trial for Mike Tys Jurors are quoted as changing their view of the case, suggesting the victim was not credible. The
Email chain hints at possible Trump‑related document leak and involvement of client Richard Ireland
The passage contains vague references to a ‘Trump leaked the 2 pages’ and a ‘government star witness’, suggesting a potential leak or obstruction scenario, but provides no concrete names, dates, or tr Reference to ‘Trump leaked the 2 pages’ implies a possible document leak involving the former presid Mention of a ‘government star witness’ scheduled for tomorrow suggests timing of a legal proceedin
Calls for FARA Registration of Chinese‑Backed U.S. Media Outlets
The passage outlines a policy proposal to require Chinese‑owned media companies and their staff to register under FARA and lobbying laws, suggesting a potential investigative angle on ownership struct Alleged Chinese government staffing of U.S. media outlets via China News Service. Asian Culture and Media Group listed as a private company but purportedly a front for propaganda. Calls for mandatory
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.