Skip to content
Case File
d-19149House OversightOther

Court discussion on obscenity, First Amendment, and public exposure of films

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017187
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage is a routine judicial dialogue about obscenity law and First Amendment limits, mentioning only lower‑level judges and a publisher. It lacks concrete allegations, financial flows, or ties t Debate over whether knowledge of an obscene film’s showing is protected speech. Reference to Grove Press and potential billboard advertising of obscene material. Judges Julian and Aldrich express per

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

first-amendmentcourt-transcriptcensorshiplegal-exposureobscenityhouse-oversightconstitutional-issue
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court dialogue on obscenity case involving Grove Press and alleged First Amendment misuse

The passage records a courtroom exchange featuring Judge Aldrich, Judge Julian, and attorney Alan Dershowitz discussing obscenity standards and profit motives. It offers no concrete leads, transaction Alan Dershowitz argues the film should be protected by the First Amendment despite alleged obscenity Judges question whether the case is driven by profit rather than free speech. Reference to Grove P

1p
House OversightLegal FilingNov 11, 2025

Challenge to Boston prosecutor over adult theater film regulation

The passage describes a low‑level legal strategy involving a state prosecutor and three district judges. It provides no concrete financial flows, high‑level officials, or novel allegations of miscondu Attorney sought injunction against Boston prosecutor Garrett Byrne. Case heard by Judges Aldrich, Julian, and Raymond Pettine. Argument centered on First Amendment rights versus state regulation of a

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Assange allegedly coordinated Sarah Harrison’s rapid deployment to Hong Kong to aid Snowden’s escape to Russia

The passage provides a detailed narrative linking Julian Assange, Sarah Harrison, and Edward Snowden, suggesting a coordinated operation to move Snowden to Russia via Hong Kong. It names specific indi Assange reportedly advised Snowden to seek asylum in Russia and fabricated a story of a route throug Assange instructed senior WikiLeaks staffer Sarah Harrison to abandon an Australian political camp

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Snowden’s alleged Hong Kong escape plan involving Assange and intermediaries

The passage hints at a coordinated effort by Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, and unnamed intermediaries (Tibbo, Man, Ho) to use Hong Kong as a transit point for a covert escape to Moscow. It provides Snowden reportedly planned to transit Hong Kong en route to Moscow, using it only as a temporary cov Intermediaries named Tibbo, Man, and Ho allegedly provided logistical support. Julian Assange is s

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jacob Appelbaum’s deep ties to WikiLeaks and anti‑NSA activism raise questions about possible covert collaborations

The passage outlines specific connections between Jacob Appelbaum—a known hacktivist and former WikiLeaks security manager—and high‑profile figures such as Julian Assange. It mentions his role in prot Jacob Appelbaum served as WikiLeaks’ North American representative and managed its cybersecurity dur Assange publicly praised Appelbaum and selected him as a keynote replacement at a major hacker con

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Snowden contacts Julian Assange while Hong Kong intelligence tails journalist Laura Poitras

The passage hints at a direct communication between Edward Snowden and Julian Assange during Snowden's exit from Hong Kong and suggests that Hong Kong intelligence services were monitoring journalist Snowden called Julian Assange on June 14‑15, 2013 while arranging his departure from Hong Kong. Hong Kong intelligence services reportedly knew Poitras was in contact with Snowden and tailed her. Poi

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.