Federal prosecutors allegedly pressured Jeffrey Epstein to pay large sums to dubious “victims” and appointed a civil attorney with personal ties to...
Summary
The passage suggests possible prosecutorial misconduct and a conflict of interest in the handling of alleged Epstein victims, providing specific dollar amounts, legal statutes, and personal connection Prosecutors demanded Epstein pay at least $150,000 per alleged victim, many of whom were later ident The U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) proposed paying fees for a civil attorney they selected for the
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Internal email chain discussing Jeffrey Epstein's 2018 plea deal, federal‑state jurisdiction clash, and potential political leverage involving Alex...
The passage reveals a private strategy discussion about framing Epstein’s case to implicate high‑level officials (Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, former U.S. Attorney, and former special counsel Ken S Email mentions Alex Acosta (then U.S. Attorney, later Secretary of Labor) as a target for political Ken Starr is referenced as a source of commentary on the deal, indicating possible coordination wi
Epstein Plea Deal Linked to Federal Non‑Prosecution and Victim Compensation Agreement
The passage reveals a specific agreement where the U.S. Attorney’s Office secured a federal non‑prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in exchange for a victim‑compensation arrangement covering 34 alleged vic Epstein entered a guilty plea on June 30, 2008 to Florida state sex offenses. As part of the plea, a federal agreement was reached to avoid federal prosecution. The agreement included acknowledgment
Allegations of Federal Overreach in Jeffrey Epstein State‑Level Plea Deal and Unspecified Victim Payments
The passage claims that U.S. Attorney's Office imposed an unusual settlement on Jeffrey Epstein, requiring undisclosed $150,000 payments to alleged victims and attorney fees, despite a state prosecuti Federal prosecutors allegedly forced Epstein to pay $150,000 to each unidentified victim. The agreement required Epstein to fund attorneys for victims who might file civil suits. The federal case was
Trump, Acosta, and Other High‑Profile Figures Tied to Ongoing Jeffrey Epstein Litigation
The passage links President Donald Trump, former Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, and other powerful individuals to multiple civil and criminal actions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, citing specific lawsuit Trump placed on witness list for a Palm Beach County trial involving Epstein victims. Former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, who approved Epstein’s non‑prosecution deal, later appointed Labor Attorney Jac
Starr & Whitley Letter to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip Alleging Prosecutorial Misconduct in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Review (May 19, 2008)
The document provides specific allegations of federal prosecutor misconduct, including leaks to the press, unusual financial demands on alleged victims, and potential conflicts of interest involving a Alleged leak of confidential case information to New York Times reporter by Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal prosecutors demanded $150,000 per alleged victim and payment of civil counsel fees, despit
Judge Seals Federal Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, Limiting Disclosure to Victims
The passage reveals that a federal non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein remains sealed, with limited access granted only to victims and their counsel. This provides a concrete lead—obt Federal NPA with Epstein was negotiated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and remains sealed. Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee argued the agreement was never filed under seal in federal court. Judge Ke
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.