Skip to content
Case File
d-28340House OversightOther

Epstein Victims Claim Prosecutors Secretly Barred Sex Offense Prosecutions Without Notification

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014050
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage reveals a potential pattern of undisclosed plea agreements that prevented prosecution of sexual offenses against Epstein victims, indicating possible prosecutorial misconduct and victim ri Victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) discovered undisclosed agreements blocking prosecution of Epstein's sex Prosecutors allegedly entered plea deals without informing victims, violating the Crime Victims' R

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

potential-obstruction-of-justivictim-rights-violationprosecutorial-misconductlegal-exposurehouse-oversightvictim-rightsplea-agreementsepsteincvra
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

FBI notified Epstein victims of CVRA rights before non‑prosecution agreement, suggesting DOJ misapplied victim‑rights statutes

The passage reveals that the FBI sent victim‑rights notices to Epstein’s alleged victims months before a non‑prosecution deal, implying the agency assumed CVRA applicability and later reversed its pos FBI sent a notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007, stating her rights under the CVRA. The notice preceded the non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein by over three months. The Department of Jus

2p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

FBI notified alleged Epstein victims of victim rights before non‑prosecution agreement, suggesting DOJ’s early acknowledgment of CVRA applicability

The passage reveals a concrete FBI notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007, outlining victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) prior to a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. FBI sent a victim‑rights notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7 2007. The notice referenced CVRA rights, implying DOJ initially treated Epstein’s victims as covered by th The notice preceded a non‑prosecuti

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Federal prosecutors admitted backing down on victim notifications after pressure from Jeffrey Epstein’s attorneys

The passage reveals that U.S. Attorney’s Office officials renegotiated victim‑notification letters and delayed informing a victim about a non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein, suggesting possible pr U.S. Attorney’s Office renegotiated victim‑notification letters after pressure from Epstein’s lawyer A victim (Jane Doe #1) was not told of the non‑prosecution agreement until after it was signed. As

2p
Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Verdict Sheet: 410-2

The verdict sheet outlines the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell and provides checkboxes for the jury's verdict on each count. The document is signed by the foreperson and includes the date and time.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Complaint: 08-80069

The complaint is filed by Jane Doe No. 1, a minor, through her father as parent and natural guardian, and by her father and stepmother individually, against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and abuse. The plaintiffs are all residents of Florida, and the case is brought in the Southern District of Florida. The complaint is filed under fictitious names to protect Jane Doe's identity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-1

The document discusses a court case where two additional victims, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, sought to join the action as petitioners under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, and later, the original petitioners moved to amend their petition under Rule 15 to include them. The Government opposed both motions, and the court ultimately denied the motion to amend.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.