Skip to content
Case File
d-30286House OversightFinancial Record

FCPA Guidance on Bribes to Customs Officials and Tax Officials

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022515
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage outlines legal interpretations of the FCPA and cites past cases and settlements, but it does not name current high‑profile individuals, corporations, or governments. It provides a general U.S. Fifth Circuit case United States v. Kay expands FCPA to cover bribes for tax and customs advant Bribes to foreign tax and customs officials can be prosecuted as payments to obtain or retain busi

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

corporate-compliancebriberyfinancial-flowcustomstax-evasionlegal-exposurelegal-precedenthouse-oversightregulatory-compliancefcpa
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Successor Companies Use Predecessor FCPA Settlements to Shield Future Liability

The passage outlines how corporate successors leverage predecessor FCPA agreements to avoid enforcement, but it mentions no high‑profile individuals, governments, or novel wrongdoing. It offers a proc Successor firms can gain certainty of non‑liability by signing agreements tied to predecessor FCPA s Examples include a Dutch predecessor’s deferred prosecution agreement and a Connecticut‑California

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of FCPA-related citations and government reports on corporate bribery

The document is a collection of public citations, legal filings, and government reports concerning anti‑bribery statutes and enforcement actions. It does not introduce new, actionable leads, specific References multiple SEC and DOJ enforcement cases (e.g., United States v. Peterson, United States v. Cites legislative history of the FCPA and related amendments (Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Ac

4p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

DOJ/SEC FCPA cases illustrate how foreign‑government‑controlled entities are deemed instrumentality for bribery prosecutions

The passage outlines legal standards and examples of U.S. enforcement actions against companies bribing officials of state‑owned firms in Mexico, Haiti, and Malaysia. It provides concrete details (ent U.S. DOJ and SEC regularly prosecute FCPA violations involving bribes to officials of foreign state‑ A foreign entity can be considered an instrumentality even with minority government ownership if t

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Hypothetical FCPA facilitation vs. bribery scenario for multinational mining firm

The passage outlines a fictional example of potential FCPA violations but does not name real individuals, companies, or government officials. It offers limited investigative value beyond illustrating Distinguishes facilitating payments (small, routine) from bribery (discretionary influence). Highlights risk of non‑recorded payments violating books‑and‑records provisions. Shows how environmental p

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Fiscal analysis of USA Inc. net worth showing a negative $44 trillion balance sheet

The passage is a macro‑economic commentary that presents a calculated negative net‑worth figure for the United States. It contains no specific names, transactions, dates, or actionable allegations lin Claims the U.S. government has a net negative net‑worth of roughly $44 trillion. Cites off‑balance‑sheet liabilities such as future social insurance obligations. Compares the figure to per‑person, pe

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Historical FCPA bribery cases and anti‑corruption debarment procedures referenced in House Oversight document

The passage lists several past U.S. court cases involving alleged foreign bribery (e.g., payments to Qatar officials) and outlines statutory debarment criteria and DOJ memo guidance. While it provides United States v. Carver (1979) – $1.5 M paid to Qatar official for oil drilling concession. United States v. Kenny (1979) – illegal financial assistance to political party for stamp distributi Refere

3p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.