Skip to content
Case File
d-36097House OversightOther

Jeffrey Epstein email to attorney David Schoen referencing Justice Breyer and U.S. Attorney's office

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031494
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The passage is a routine attorney‑client email from Jeffrey Epstein to his lawyer, containing vague comments about Justice Breyer’s views on sentencing and a generic complaint about the U.S. Attorney’ Email sent by Jeffrey Epstein on Feb 22, 2010 to attorney David Schoen. Mentions a recent panel in DC where Epstein sat next to Justice Stephen Breyer. Comments that Justice Breyer believes the sente

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

sentencing-commissionstephen-breyerjeffrey-epsteinus-attorneyjudicial-commentarycourt-appealdavid-schoenlegal-exposurehouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

DOJ Discipline Office Launches Probe into Attorney Conduct Over Jeffrey Epstein Plea Deal

The passage reveals a new internal DOJ investigation into possible professional misconduct by attorneys who handled Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea, implicating former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and linkin DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility opened a probe into attorney conduct in the Epstein case. Letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd to Sen. Ben Sasse disclosed the investigatio

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter

The passage suggests possible prosecutorial misconduct and unauthorized media leaks in the high‑profile Jeffrey Epstein case, offering a concrete lead (names, alleged leaks, internal communications). Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein discussed confidential allegations and plea negotiations wit Weinstein allegedly provided non‑public details about Epstein’s alleged interstate sex trafficking

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Justice Dept. discipline office opens probe into possible misconduct by attorneys handling Jeffrey Epstein case

The passage reveals a new internal Justice Department investigation into whether attorneys, possibly including former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, mishandled the prosecution of financier Jeffrey Epstein Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd disclosed the probe in a letter to Sen. Ben Sasse. The investigation targets possible professional misconduct by DOJ attorneys in the Epstein case. Jeffrey

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former U.S. Attorney Sloman Defends Secret Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal Amid Victims' Lawsuit

The passage reveals a federal lawsuit alleging that prosecutors deliberately sealed a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, kept it secret in violation of law, and granted immunity to unname Victims allege prosecutors sealed the Epstein non‑prosecution agreement to prevent them from appeari The lawsuit claims the secrecy violated federal law and that co‑conspirators were granted immunity

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

DOJ Criminal Division memo reviewing potential federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein at request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta

The document shows internal DOJ consideration of whether to prosecute Epstein, referencing U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and a senior DOJ official. It confirms high‑level legal review of a case alrea DOJ Criminal Division conducted an internal review of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation at the reque The memo notes the review was limited in scope and did not examine money‑laundering statutes. Refe

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal memo discusses federal prosecution strategy for Jeffrey Epstein and applicability of the petite policy

The document reveals that a U.S. Attorney's Office is evaluating whether to pursue federal charges against Jeffrey Epstein despite state proceedings, indicating potential high‑level prosecutorial deci Memo evaluates federal jurisdiction over commercial sexual exploitation of children in Epstein case. Discusses the 'petite policy' and its inapplicability due to overlapping state charges. Mentions t

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.