Court Filing: 12030300320
Summary
The government opposes the defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow her to use discovery materials from the criminal case in related civil cases, citing concerns about witness privacy, third-party identifying information, and the confidentiality of the ongoing grand jury investigation.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 20 Cr. 329 (AJN)
The government opposes the defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow the use of discovery materials in civil cases, citing concerns about witness privacy, third-party identifying information, and the confidentiality of ongoing grand jury investigations.
court filing: 200633
The government opposes the defendant's request to use materials related to grand jury subpoenas in civil cases, arguing that the protective order in the criminal case prohibits such use and that the defendant's request is an attempt to evade the directives of the protective order. The government had previously obtained modifications to protective orders in other cases to comply with the subpoenas.
Court Filing: 33
The document is a court filing by the U.S. Department of Justice in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, discussing the proposed protective order and the government's objections to the defendant's requests to publicly disclose victim identities. The government argues that protecting victim identities is essential due to significant privacy interests and established law in the Circuit. The filing highlights the ongoing dispute between the government and the defendant regarding the terms of the protective order.
Court Filing: 41
The government responds to Ghislaine Maxwell's request for disclosure of certain government witnesses 11 months prior to trial, arguing that the request is premature and without merit. The government highlights its expeditious production of discovery materials, totaling over 165,000 pages, and notes that the defendant's request is not supported by relevant case law.
Court Order: 476
The court orders the Government to reply to the Defendant's response regarding the authentication of Government Exhibit 52 and sets a deadline for proposed redactions to motion papers. The dispute centers on whether Employee-1 can authenticate the document given that Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee, allegedly removed it from the property before Employee-1 began working for Jeffrey Epstein.
Court Filing: 92
The document includes a letter from the government requesting an extension of the deadline for producing electronic discovery, which was granted by the court. It also includes a court order regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement and the government's obligations to ensure her access to legal materials.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.