Response to government's memorandum: 2016603608
Summary
The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion for release, written by William Julié, a French lawyer. It analyzes the French Minister of Justice's letter and argues that the key question is whether France can extradite a French national under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, not under French legislation. The document highlights the precedence of international agreements over national legislation according to the French Constitution.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion...
The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion for release, written by William Julié, a French lawyer. It analyzes the French Minister of Justice's letter and argues that the key question is whether France can extradite a French national under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, not under French legislation. The document highlights the precedence of international agreements over national legislation according to the French Constitution.
Memorandum/Opinion: 20-cr-00880-AJN Document 11-02 Filed 03/23/21 Page d31of518
The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters.
Legal Memorandum/Expert Opinion: Case 1:04-cr-00320-AJT Document 1033-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 366 of 4
The document is a legal analysis by William Julié, a French lawyer, discussing the extradition laws between France and the USA. It argues that the French government has discretion to extradite its nationals under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, and questions the relevance of the Peterson case as a precedent. The analysis highlights the difference between a judicial decision and a discretionary decision by the French Ministry of Justice in extradition matters.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum of Law: 383
The United States government submits a reply memorandum in support of its motions in limine, seeking to protect the identities of minor victims by allowing them to testify under pseudonyms or first names and sealing related exhibits. The government argues that this measure is necessary to safeguard the victims' privacy and dignity, while the defendant has not demonstrated a particularized need for disclosure.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 547
The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.
Court Filing - Exhibit Document: 20-1700088
The document discusses the case of Djamel Beghal, a dual French-Algerian citizen who was deprived of his French nationality and deported to Algeria. It highlights the French government's use of citizenship deprivation as a means to facilitate removal from France, and the complexities surrounding extradition and deportation under European human rights law.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.