court transcript: A-5768
Summary
The document is a transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, discussing the investigation into Juror No. 1 and potential appellate issues. Brune testifies that his firm did not investigate Juror No. 1 further after the verdict. The witness denies attempting to 'sandbag' the court or plant error in the record regarding Juror No. 1.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (6)
Related Documents (6)
court transcript: A-5918
The document is a court transcript where MS. DAVIS argues that Mr. Parse's attorney made strategic choices that benefited him, and that MR. SHECHTMAN has not met the Strickland standard for ineffective assistance of counsel. The court had previously ruled on a motion for a new trial related to Catherine Conrad, a juror who was known to the defendant's law firm, Brune & Richard.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 91 of 130
The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumption that the government had also conducted a Google search on a juror. The court questions Brune about why they didn't disclose certain information earlier.
court transcript: A-5742
The witness, Brune, testifies about working late and being present when the judge restarted jury deliberations due to a juror's illness. Brune states they did not believe there was an issue to raise with the court at the time.
court transcript: A-5745
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a conversation regarding a suspension opinion and whether certain individuals were informed about it. The witness is unsure if Ms. Edelstein asked to see the suspension opinion, but confirms that Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about the issue on May 12th.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.