Mr. Johnson
plaintiff in a referenced court case (Johnson v. Armontront)
Mentioned in 5 documents. Roles: plaintiff in a referenced court case (Johnson v. Armontront), reference to a previous court case, defendant in a cited case, Recipient of the email, likely a prison official or administrator
Mr. Johnson is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
6 sources for document mentions
transcript: A-5927
“The speaker argues that a lawyer's decision not to strike a juror was not a strategic choice, but ra”
court filing: Case 1:20-cv-08064-JGK-DCF Document 103 Filed 12/14/20 Filed 08/09/20 Page 11 of 13
“The court considers the public interest in allowing the plaintiff's claims to proceed against Maxwel”
court filing: Case:20-17-00-8854-APD Document:1859 Filed:03/22/21 Page:13 of 20
“The document discusses a court case where the defendant, Schulte, challenges the indictment obtained”
email: DOJ-OGR-00023626
“The email from an attorney to Mr. Johnson details issues with Jeffrey Epstein's prison conditions, i”
email: DOJ-OGR-00023698
“The email from Jeffrey Epstein's representative details issues with Epstein's prison conditions, inc”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 6 documents”
Known Connections (3)
Document Mentions (6)
transcript: A-5927
The speaker argues that a lawyer's decision not to strike a juror was not a strategic choice, but rather a 'tragic misjudgment', and discusses the motivations behind certain tax transactions.
court filing: Case 1:20-cv-08064-JGK-DCF Document 103 Filed 12/14/20 Filed 08/09/20 Page 11 of 13
The court considers the public interest in allowing the plaintiff's claims to proceed against Maxwell, but ultimately decides that the risk of impairing the criminal prosecution outweighs this interest, and grants a stay of the case in its entirety.
court filing: Case:20-17-00-8854-APD Document:1859 Filed:03/22/21 Page:13 of 20
The document discusses a court case where the defendant, Schulte, challenges the indictment obtained from White Plains, arguing that the relevant community is the district or division where the trial will be held. The court distinguishes this case from United States v. Johnson and applies the absolute disparity method to analyze underrepresentation.
email: DOJ-OGR-00023626
The email from an attorney to Mr. Johnson details issues with Jeffrey Epstein's prison conditions, including denied requests for bathroom access, phone calls, and proper meals during attorney meetings. The attorney seeks resolution on these matters, referencing a prior meeting where certain accommodations were allegedly promised. The email highlights the tension between Epstein's legal team and prison authorities.
email: DOJ-OGR-00023698
The email from Jeffrey Epstein's representative details issues with Epstein's prison conditions, including restricted bathroom access, unfulfilled phone calls, and inadequate meal arrangements during attorney meetings, and requests resolution.
Allegations of sexual misconduct involving a senior official named Johnson and references to Kennedy family scandals
The passage contains unverified, anecdotal accusations of lewd behavior by an unnamed 'Mr. Johnson' and vague references to Kennedy family scandals. It lacks concrete names, dates, transactions, or ac Claims that a senior figure referred to only as 'Mr. Johnson' engaged in public sexual exhibitionism Reference to alleged early‑morning encounters with Lady Bird Johnson. Mention of a purported offer
This dossier on Mr. Johnson was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.