Skip to content
Case File
d-1208House OversightLegal Filing

The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defen...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1208
Pages
1
Persons
5

Summary

The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defendant's memorandum and seeking to file certain exhibits under seal to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties. The proposed redactions are justified under the three-part test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The government is submitting proposed redactions to the Court by email.

Tags

Redaction requests for defendant's memorandumProtection of victims' and third parties' privacy interestsSealing of certain exhibits
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 278

The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defendant's memorandum and seeking to file certain exhibits under seal to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties. The proposed redactions are justified under the three-part test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The government is submitting proposed redactions to the Court by email.

2p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed un...

The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed under temporary seal due to sensitive information. The government is given two days to respond to the proposed redactions. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting to file...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting to file certain court documents under seal or with redactions to protect sensitive information. The government is submitting an unredacted version of their memorandum of law and exhibits in opposition to the defendant's pre-trial motions, while proposing redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy and the integrity of their investigation.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the...

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case, discussing the government's concerns and requests related to the defendant's use of Rule 17(c) subpoenas. The government argues that Rule 17(c) is not a discovery device and requests the court to direct the defendant to provide notice of subpoenas and to mark productions as confidential. The letter provides an overview of the legal standards governing Rule 17(c) subpoenas.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.