Skip to content
Case File
d-311House OversightLegal Filing

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-311
Pages
1
Persons
6

Summary

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

Tags

Proposed redactions to pre-trial motionsProtective Order and confidentialityPrivacy interests of victim-witnesses
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 128

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

2p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court orders defense counsel to respond to the government's July 1, 2021 letter motion by July 9...

The court orders defense counsel to respond to the government's July 1, 2021 letter motion by July 9, 2021. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the government ...

The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the government responds to the defendant's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names. The court ultimately denies the motion, and the government argues that the defendant has not met the strict standard for reconsideration. The government's response highlights the court's careful crafting of the juror questionnaire and voir dire process to ensure a fair jury is selected.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defense ...

The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defense is requesting the court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment and to improve Maxwell's access to discovery materials while in confinement. The government opposes the disclosure, citing privacy rights of the alleged victims and suggesting that the information will be provided closer to trial.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court has received the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the Ghislaine Max...

The court has received the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the Ghislaine Maxwell case and is requesting additional submissions from the government, the defendant, and victims before making a ruling. The court has outlined specific requirements for the government's memorandum of law and the submission of grand jury transcripts. The defendant's and victims' positions on the proposed disclosure are also due by August 5, 2025.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.