Skip to content
Case File
d-14426Dept. of Justice

PROFFER AGREEMENT [SIGNED_MAXWELL_PROFFER_AGREEMENT_(REDACTED)]

Date
December 19, 2025
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
EFTA: signed_maxwell_proffer_agreement_(redacted)
Pages
2
Persons
8

Summary

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of Ghislaine Maxwell ("Client") and his attorney, David Oscar Markus, Esq., with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida on July 24 and 25, 2025 ("the meeting"), the...

This document is from the DOJ EFTA Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

eftacourt-filingghislaine-maxwell
Browse DOJ EFTA ReleasesEFTA: signed_maxwell_proffer_agreement_(redacted)
Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT 
With respect to the meeting of Ghislaine Maxwell ("Client") and his attorney, David Oscar 
Markus, Esq., with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to be held at the Office of the United 
States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida on July 24 and 25, 2025 ("the meeting"), the 
following understandings exist: 
(1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to 
provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government 
may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving 
Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter 
into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The 
Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached 
in connection with this proffer. 
(2) ln any prosecution brought against Client by this Department, except as provided below 
the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing 
proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client 
at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury 
with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony 
given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive 
from justice. 
(3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived 
directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which 
evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution 
brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all 
evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should 
Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to 
rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or 
issues raised sua sponte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including 
bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client. 
(4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a 
reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States 
Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D 1.1 (b)(l 8) or 5Cl .2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may 
offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the 
meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is 
consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. 
(5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence 
any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the 
United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other 
federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of 
this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. 

(6) lf this Department receives a request from another prosecutor's office for access to 
information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Department may furnish such 
information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of 
this Agreement. 
(7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client 
at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at 
any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered 
into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be 
entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. 
(8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs l through 7 above extend to the continuation 
of this meeting on the dates that appear below. 
(9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every 
paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. 
Dated: Tallahassee, Florida 
.:TC ly ;;:J '11 ;;!o ;;t <; (date) 
TODD BLANCHE 
b 
Client 
If applicable: 
Interpreter 
Dates of Continuation 

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticePlea AgreementDec 19, 2025

PROFFER AGREEMENT [Signed Maxwell Proffer Agreement (Redacted)]

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of Ghislaine Maxwell ("Client") and his attorney, David Oscar Markus, Esq., with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida on July 24 and 25, 2025 ("the meeting"), ...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11_DOJ_OFFICE_OF_PROFESSIONAL_RESPONSIBILITY_REPORT_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_(1)]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Inve...

22p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11_DOJ_OFFICE_OF_PROFESSIONAL_RESPONSIBILITY_REPORT_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Inve...

22p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11_DOJ_OFFICE_OF_PROFESSIONAL_RESPONSIBILITY_REPORT_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Inve...

22p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Government's Memorandum in Response to the Court's Orders: 796

The document is a government memorandum responding to court orders regarding the disclosure of grand jury transcripts in the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It discusses the factors set forth in In re Craig for determining whether to disclose grand jury materials and addresses the government's position on the matter. The government is seeking to unseal certain grand jury transcripts while also requesting to file a supplemental submission to protect victims' interests.

10p
Dept. of JusticeTestimonyDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.