Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-17607House OversightOther

Defense Spending Trends and Potential Cuts Highlighted in Oversight Report

The passage provides general statistics on U.S. defense spending and mentions possible budget cuts, but it contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑pro Defense spending is the second‑largest federal expense after entitlements. Spending has risen due to Afghanistan and Iraq wars but remains below long‑term GDP trend. Overhead accounts for roughly 40%

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020873
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides general statistics on U.S. defense spending and mentions possible budget cuts, but it contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑pro Defense spending is the second‑largest federal expense after entitlements. Spending has risen due to Afghanistan and Iraq wars but remains below long‑term GDP trend. Overhead accounts for roughly 40%

Tags

government-financepolicy-recommendationbudget-analysisdefense-budgetfederal-spendinghouse-oversightoversightbudget-deficits

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Defense Spending Is The Second-Largest Expense Item After Entitlements, But Below Long-Term Trend as Share of GDP ¢ With budget deficits rising, some advocate cutting back on defense spending, the second-largest expense item after entitlements. ¢ Defense spending has risen substantially in recent years, due to the wars in Afghanistan and Irag, and other costs related to the Global War on Terror. As a percentage of GDP, however, defense spending in the U.S. remains below its 60- year trend. ¢ On an inflation-adjusted basis, U.S. defense spending is at its highest level since World War Il. With overhead ~40% of all spending, the Defense Business Board found DoD consistently pays “more for less” and fails to attack overhead as the private sector would.1 ¢ The Esquire Commission to Balance the Federal Budget, a group of four former Republican and Democratic senators, found over $300 billion? in defense restructuring opportunities, and other analysts proposed gradual cuts to reduce the defense budget by 14% by 2018. 2 Notes: 1) The Defense Business Board , “Reducing Overhead and Improving Business Operations, “July 2010, http://dbb.defense. gov; 2) see Esquire Commission to Balance the Federal Budget, http:/Avww.esquire. com/blogs/politics/federal-budget-statistics-1 110.; 3) Gordon Adams and Matthew K P Leatherman, “A Leaner and Meaner National Defense,” Foreign Affairs, Jan/Feb 2011) (@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 63 Defense Spending Has Risen, Driven by Wars in Afghanistan + Iraq... USA Inc. Inflation-Adjusted* Defense Spending by Type, F1948 - F2010 = Other Vietnam War « RDT&E* $400B --- = Procurement = Operations & $200B --- Maintenance U.S. Inflation-Adjusted Defense Spending ($B) =u Personnel $B 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 Note: *Adjusted for inflation using GDP price index. **RDT&E is Research, Development, Test & Evaluation. KP Source: White House OMB. (@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 64

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.kpcb.com
URLhttp://dbb.defense

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.