Skip to content
Case File
d-1845House OversightLegal Filing

The US Attorney's office opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay the proceedings, arguing that t...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1845
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The US Attorney's office opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay the proceedings, arguing that the request is based on speculation about an unreleased interview with Juror 50. The government asserts that the court has already conducted a thorough hearing and completed the fact-finding process. The application should be denied, according to the government.

Tags

request for stayGhislaine Maxwell caseJuror 50 interview
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that neither the government nor the defense ...

The US Attorney's office informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that neither the government nor the defense seeks redactions to Exhibit L of Reply Brief 3, and it will be filed publicly. The letter is in response to the court's order regarding potential redactions. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed ...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to certain reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests that certain information be redacted or sealed to protect the privacy interests of third parties and victims. The defense has indicated its position on the proposed redactions, and the government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redaction...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions to reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy interests, which the court ultimately grants. The court also orders the parties to propose redactions or file Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6 on the public docket.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's Office requests the court to permit redactions to certain documents related to Ghi...

The US Attorney's Office requests the court to permit redactions to certain documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case to protect third-party privacy interests. The proposed redactions are narrowly tailored and consistent with the Lugosch test. The defense and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP take no position on the government's redaction requests.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's Office requests that Exhibits A and B be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell...

The US Attorney's Office requests that Exhibits A and B be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, citing the need to protect the privacy interests of a victim and third party. The request is made in response to the court's order and is justified under the three-part test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The government argues that sealing the exhibits is narrowly tailored to protect these interests.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's Office submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislain...

The US Attorney's Office submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The letter details Maxwell's access to discovery materials, communication with her attorneys, and the search procedures in place at the MDC. The Government reports that Maxwell is receiving extensive accommodations, including 13 hours a day, 7 days a week to review discovery, and 25 hours a week of video-teleconference calls with her counsel.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.