Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19593House OversightOther

Philosophical discourse on sacred space, percolation theory, and Poincaré topology – no actionable investigative content

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013633
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of abstract academic commentary on religion, mathematics, and forest fire modeling. It contains no names, dates, transactions, or allegations linking any influential actors to mis References to Rudolf Otto, Mircea Eliade, and Henri Poincaré are purely scholarly. Discusses concepts of percolation, singularities, and sacred vs. profane without any factual claims No mention of f

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

mathematicstheoryreligionhouse-oversightphilosophy
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
density, kindling temperature and desperation-induced willing of faith, sweep through the entire woods in a sudden blaze. This is the spirit of percolation. Computer simulations of percolating blazes generate a multiplicity of life times of forest fires near the singularity that represents the transition to a global conflagration. Mentioned previously is Rudolf Otto’s 1917 book about the characteristics of religious experience, Das Heilige, The Sacred, which described phases in the discontinuous transition from everyday life to the wholly other (ganz andere) reality of the world of the sacred. They include intense rofane. In his 1958 book, Patterns in Comparative Religions, this well-known historian of religion called the revelatory occurrence of sacred reality an hierophany. Eliade’s classic work, The Sacred and the Profane, contrasts the homogenous, spiritually formless and relative world of the profane with the results of passage through spatial and temporal singularities to a place and time that are not of this world. Poincaré said that the brain did not know of absolute space, but rather established a model of it through internal reconstructions of sequential sensory experiences that_accompanied our exploratory movements. A world. It was Poincare’s habit to topologize the dynamics of motion in mathematical problems that lacked analytic solutions. In this way, simple algebraic operations replace some of the insoluble problems of the calculus. Eliade’s sacred space defining singularity in the plane that breaks profane homogeneousness, a center point that is no longer a circle, can be viewed also as Poincaré’s topological center. real physical movements around such singular fixed points. The operational object called groups defines this kind of algebraic, mathematical structure and motion. 133

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.