Case File
d-21480House OversightOtherTrading strategy recommending volatility dispersion trade on EU banks
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014980
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage is a financial trading recommendation with no mention of political figures, government agencies, or alleged misconduct. It offers no investigative leads related to power actors or controve Suggests buying a call basket on Santander, BNP Paribas, ING, Intesa, Deutsche Bank Recommends selling a worst‑of call on the same basket Cites low implied volatility and correlation as entry points
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
derivativeseu-banksvolatility-tradinghouse-oversightfinance
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #014980
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Volatility in Europe
Buy EU banks dispersion: (+) basket call, (-) worst-of calls
Trade: Long Dec17 105% call on an equally weighted basket of SAN, BNP, ING,
ISP & DBK*, short Dec17 ATM worst-of call on the same basket for 1.8% indic.
(correl bid: 81%).
* We pick the top 5 stocks with the largest market cap within the SX7E (EU banks sector
index) corresponding to 5 different countries
We have previously highlighted our preference for vol dispersion trades both in the US
and the EU — with the most recent recommendation being sector dispersion
opportunities within the EU. In a similar vein, we suggest positioning for greater
dispersion within EU banks via buying a call on a basket of Santander, BNP Paribas, ING,
Intesa and Deutsche Bank part-financed by selling a worst-of call on the same basket as:
¢ Improving macro/earnings, sensitivity to rates and regulatory headwinds likely
to lead to greater differentiation within banks: An improving macro backdrop in
Europe & ongoing improvement in EPS revisions (see Style Cycle) paint a bullish
picture for EU banks as they are seen as leveraged macro plays within the EU.
However, we believe there is a potential for greater differentiation within banks as
our bank analysts have argued before (here and here} that: (i) some banks stand to
benefit more than others based on their earnings power should the uptick in the
earnings cycle continue, (ii) banks’ gearing to interest rate cycles, and therefore
likely impact from a more hawkish ECB, varies between different banks and (iii)
French and Benelux banks are likely to be most impacted under potential Basel IV
regulations.
+ Entry point is attractive given historically low implied vols: The structure
benefits from its long vol bias as average 6M implied vol on the basket of 5
European banks is historically low (13% %-ile since Jan-08, Chart 16).
¢ High implied correlation beneficial for structure’s short correlation bias: Chart
17 shows the average pairwise 6M and 3M realised correlations between the 5 EU
banks, which are historically low. Despite this recent drop in realised correlations,
implied correlation is priced higher, thus providing an interesting entry point for the
(short-correlation) trade.
Bankof America <> ; dee Ios
Merrill Lynch Global Equity Volatility Insights | 20 June 2017 9
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.