Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-21621House OversightOther

Opinion piece proposing a U.S. Secretary of Culture and naming potential nominees

The passage is an editorial suggestion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads. It merely mentions public figures (Obama, Sellars, Botstein) in a speculative context, offe Suggests creating a new Cabinet-level post of Secretary of Culture. Names conductor Michael Sellars and Bard College president Leon Botstein as hypothetical nominees. Speculates that President Obama

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026600
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is an editorial suggestion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads. It merely mentions public figures (Obama, Sellars, Botstein) in a speculative context, offe Suggests creating a new Cabinet-level post of Secretary of Culture. Names conductor Michael Sellars and Bard College president Leon Botstein as hypothetical nominees. Speculates that President Obama

Tags

cabinet-nominationpublic-officialsculture-policyarts-fundinghouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
The case for naming a U.S. secretary of Culture - latimes.com Page 3 of 3 courts controversy ever going to become a national spokesperson, to say nothing of a Washington official? Sellars, however, happens to be one of the most persuasive and inspirational public figures we have. He exhibits a bottomless empathy and spirituality with broad reach. Yes, some of his productions have been left-leaning, but he can, one on one, reach just about everyone. He is politically motivated and sophisticated. He thinks profoundly about social issues. He also has a way with politicians. A few years ago he was asked to speak at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, about nuclear proliferation — something he became highly knowledgeable about when he and composer John Adams put on “Doctor Atomic,” an opera about the creation of the atomic bomb. Sellars held heads of state in awe. My second nomination is Leon Botstein, president of Bard College in New York state. He is one of our few remaining public intellectuals and a renaissance man, which means he is a conductor, educator and scholar. He too is unusually persuasive when speaking on any number of issues to any kind of audience. Yes, he's also a liberal, one who as a young man could hold his brilliant own against William F. Buckley on "Firing Line." But he is just as brilliant an administrator who, in his nearly 40-year tenure at Bard, has made the school into one of the most progressive and prominent humanities colleges in the country by appealing to donors on all sides of the political spectrum. He's an egghead who goes on "The Colbert Report." Botstein makes things happen, and he makes them happen by persuading people to look beyond their preconceptions, to view society in broad and grand terms. He is someone politicians and the people could listen to. So what is the likelihood that Obama will announce on the steps of the Capitol on Monday that over these next four years he wants to make the arts a national priority and for that reason he is now nominating Sellars or Botstein to the newly created post of secretary of Culture? Zero. He's not crazy. Still, if Albania can have one, why can't we? murk [email protected] MORE INTERACTIVE: Christopher Depictions of violence in PHOTOS: Arts and culture in Hawthorne's On the Boulevards theater and more pictures Copyright © 2013, Los Angeles Times http://www. latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culture/la-et-cm-secretary-of-culture-notebook... 3/27/2013

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightMar 27, 2013

Op‑ed urging President Obama to create a Cabinet‑level Secretary of Culture

Op‑ed urging President Obama to create a Cabinet‑level Secretary of Culture The passage is an opinion piece advocating a new cultural cabinet post. It contains no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads involving powerful officials beyond the President, and the idea has been publicly discussed for years. Key insights: Calls for a U.S. Secretary of Culture at the Cabinet level.; Mentions existing arts agencies (NEA, NEH) and political opposition to them.; References Mitt Romney’s past proposal to cut the NEA.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Opinion piece urging creation of a U.S. Secretary of Culture

The document is an editorial advocating a new cabinet position and naming cultural figures as potential nominees. It contains no concrete allegations, financial data, or actionable leads involving pow Calls for a Cabinet-level Department of Culture to consolidate NEA and NEH. Mentions President Obama’s cabinet selection process in early 2013. Suggests Peter Sellars and Leon Botstein as possible se

4p
House OversightUnknown

Opinion piece proposing a U.S. Secretary of Culture and naming potential nominees

Opinion piece proposing a U.S. Secretary of Culture and naming potential nominees The passage is an editorial suggestion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads. It merely mentions public figures (Obama, Sellars, Botstein) in a speculative context, offering no investigative value. Key insights: Suggests creating a new Cabinet-level post of Secretary of Culture.; Names conductor Michael Sellars and Bard College president Leon Botstein as hypothetical nominees.; Speculates that President Obama might announce such a nomination, which the author deems unlikely.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims th Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russel Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Am

283p
House OversightUnknown

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Broad AI risk and corporate influence overview – no concrete misconduct but many potential leads

Broad AI risk and corporate influence overview – no concrete misconduct but many potential leads The document surveys AI development, risks, and societal impacts, naming major tech firms (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, IBM), AI labs (DeepMind, OpenAI, Future of Life Institute), and influential figures (Elon Musk, Max Tegmark, Stuart Russell). It highlights concerns about corporate data monetization, surveillance, autonomous weapons, algorithmic bias, AI in finance, legal systems, and military use. While it lacks specific allegations or detailed evidence, it points to sectors and actors where investigative follow‑up could uncover misuse, financial flows, or policy gaps. Key insights: Mentions corporate AI labs (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, IBM) developing powerful AI systems.; Highlights AI-driven data monetization and privacy erosion via targeted advertising and surveillance.; References autonomous weapons and AI use in military contexts as a security risk.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.