Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-23251House OversightOther

Transcript excerpt referencing joinder motion in Jane Doe v. United States case

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021840
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a minor procedural detail from a court filing, naming only lower‑profile attorneys (Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell). It lacks concrete leads about financial flows, misconduct Mentions a joinder motion filed for Jane Doe #3 and #4 in a CVRA action. Document signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards and counsel Paul G. Cassell (pro hac vice). Appears to be a rough draft of a Ho

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

legal-documentcourt-filingjane-doe-litigationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightprocedural
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 17 in the case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus the United States. This is number 2. (4 Plaintiff's * Defendant's I.D. Exhibit No. 2 - “ description was marked for identification. ) BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Mr. Cassell, do you have those documents in front of you? A. I do. Q. Okay. I'm going to ask you first about Exhibit 2 before 1, since exhibit 2 is first in chronological order. A. Yes. Q. Is this the motion for joinder that you filed on behalf of the parties then known as Jane Doe Number 3 and Jane Doe Number 4 in what was called the CVRA action? A. This is the joinder motion, yes. Q. Okay. And if you look at the last page before the certificate of service -- A. Yes. Q. -- over on page 12, it shows the document being signed by Bradley J. Edwards and then it says and Paul G. Cassell, pro hac vice, S.J. Queeny [sic] College of Law A. Quinney. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures

The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s

17p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

.kt5 P0Sh4s.

.kt5 P0Sh4s. $002.08 _ant Clam kik. Fan Pip Weeny. Ye,. ..nortas Cum" Cenwcui Uwe cn -AMIN PAT /001USTIC tea. 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 333O1 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. Assistant U.S. Attorneys 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00184099 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA00184100 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA00184101 CONFIDENTIAL IDENTY OF PSEUDONYMS USED IN DISCOVERY REQUESTS EFTA00184102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE MI and JANE DOE k2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING "VICTIM" STATUS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (- the victims), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce within 30 days the original or best copy of the items listed

29p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING CO-CONSPIRATOR IMMUNITY PROVISION AND RELATED SUBJECTS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce within 30 days the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE 99) directing discovery in this case, the Court's Order denying the Government's motion to dismiss and lifting stay of discovery (DE 189), the Court's Omnibus Order (DE 190), and the Court's Order Denying Motion to Join (DE 324): BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have repeatedly asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in thi

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.