Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-23251House OversightOther

Transcript excerpt referencing joinder motion in Jane Doe v. United States case

The passage provides a minor procedural detail from a court filing, naming only lower‑profile attorneys (Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell). It lacks concrete leads about financial flows, misconduct Mentions a joinder motion filed for Jane Doe #3 and #4 in a CVRA action. Document signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards and counsel Paul G. Cassell (pro hac vice). Appears to be a rough draft of a Ho

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021840
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a minor procedural detail from a court filing, naming only lower‑profile attorneys (Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell). It lacks concrete leads about financial flows, misconduct Mentions a joinder motion filed for Jane Doe #3 and #4 in a CVRA action. Document signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards and counsel Paul G. Cassell (pro hac vice). Appears to be a rough draft of a Ho

Tags

legal-documentcourt-filingjane-doe-litigationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightprocedural

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 17 in the case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus the United States. This is number 2. (4 Plaintiff's * Defendant's I.D. Exhibit No. 2 - “ description was marked for identification. ) BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Mr. Cassell, do you have those documents in front of you? A. I do. Q. Okay. I'm going to ask you first about Exhibit 2 before 1, since exhibit 2 is first in chronological order. A. Yes. Q. Is this the motion for joinder that you filed on behalf of the parties then known as Jane Doe Number 3 and Jane Doe Number 4 in what was called the CVRA action? A. This is the joinder motion, yes. Q. Okay. And if you look at the last page before the certificate of service -- A. Yes. Q. -- over on page 12, it shows the document being signed by Bradley J. Edwards and then it says and Paul G. Cassell, pro hac vice, S.J. Queeny [sic] College of Law A. Quinney. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks to Seal Deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] While Alleging Prior Immunity Deal with Epstein and False Clinton Presence Claims

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz is attempting to keep a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] confidential, while simultaneously asserting that former President Clinton was not on Epstein’s island an Dershowitz requests the court modify a confidentiality order to use Giuffre’s deposition in his defe The motion cites a former FBI Director’s FOIA finding that President Clinton was not on Little St.

39p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Ders...

The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusatio Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them wi

25p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s

76p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures

The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s

17p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Motion Seeks to Disclose Sealed Deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] and Cites FOIA Findings on Clinton’s Absence from Epstein Island

The filing reveals a strategy to push a sealed deposition of a key Epstein witness to law‑enforcement agencies, cites former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s opinion that no Secret Service records exist of Dershowitz requests court clarification to share sealed deposition with State and US Attorneys for p Freeh’s FOIA‑based opinion asserts no Secret Service logs of Clinton traveling to Epstein’s island

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.