Vague email exchange mentioning a film project and Trump without substantive detailsJ.P. Morgan Global Asset Allocation Outlook – No Direct Leads to Misconduct
Case File
d-23547House OversightOtherCode Enforcement Board fines Mark Remson Trust for repeat property violations in Palm Beach
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016558
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage documents a routine local code enforcement action involving a trust and municipal officials. It provides specific case numbers, dates, and fine amounts, but it does not implicate high‑leve Case #08-2517 concerns 2270 E. Ibis Isle Road and the Mark Remson Trust. Violation of Chapter 42, Section 42-86 of Palm Beach Code; repeat violation. Fine recommended at $500 (maximum for repeat) plu
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
municipal-compliancelegal-exposureproperty-violationsmunicipal-code-enforcementhouse-oversighttrust-entitylocal-government
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #016558
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes 07/17/08
question of whether the space is legitimate because people will subdivide suites
and make two spaces where there should only be one. Mr. Gerry said it looked
like a legal space from the documentation Mr. Clark provided but the Zoning
Administrator needed to approve it.
MOTION BY MR. FRIED TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL AUGUST
21, 2008
SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
H. Case # 08-2517, 2270 E. Ibis Isle Road, Mark Remson Trust
REPEAT Violation of Chapter 42, Section 42-86 of the Town of Palm Beach
Code of Ordinances, Environment, properties to be maintained in a good
condition.
Code Enforcement Officer Weymer presented the facts of the case and said the
violation was discovered from routine patrol in the area but shortly after the notice
of repeat violation was sent out, a citizen complaint was received as well. Mr.
Weymer said there had been at least seven previous letters to this property owner
regarding lack of maintenance on the property. A repeat notice of code violation
was mailed out on June 24, 2008 with a mandatory hearing date. The lot was cut
on or around July 2, 2008. This particular violation is a Class I violation under
the fine schedule which calls for a fine of $400.00, however, by law, the Board has
the ability to impose a fine of up to $500.00 because it is a repeat violation. Mr.
Weymer said he believes it is important to look at the track record of this property
in considering the fine. The Town recommends a finding of non-compliance,
administrative costs in the amount of $150.00 and a fine of $500.00, which is the
maximum fine for a repeat violation.
Mr. Hoffman said it seemed that every time the property owner gets notified he
comes into compliance but he has to be notified. Mr. Weymer says there are times
when he comes into compliance but on at least two other occasions, he has been
before the Board because he has not complied by the time set. Mr. Ochstein asked
if he has been fined in the past and Mr. Weymer said there are two outstanding
fines for which liens have been placed on the property.
MOTION BY MS. GREENBERG TO FIND THE VIOLATOR IN NON-
COMPLIANCE, ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT
OF $150.00 AND A FINE OF $500.00
SECONDED BY MS. DUEMLER
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
L Case # 08-2518, 230 Esplanade Way, Kenneth J. Horton
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.