Academic footnotes on federal vs. state jurisdiction in sexual assault and police misconduct cases
Summary
The passage consists of scholarly citations and general discussion of legal frameworks without naming specific individuals, transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers minimal investigative val Discusses federalism-based enforcement redundancy in crimes like sexual assault. References the Violence Against Women Act and its lack of federal criminal offenses. Notes federal statutes (e.g., 18
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
“...National Crime Victimization Survey estimated 431,840 rapes/sexual assaults in 2015); Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate Per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1996 -2015, Fed. Bureau Investigation, hittps://ucr fbi...”
U.S. Attorney“...s). On the prospect of reduced federal commitment to this strategy in the Trump administration, see U.S. Attorney Gen., supra note 24; Horwitz et al., supra note 24. 197 See Dripps, supra note 149, at 19 & n.100...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Proposed Amendments to Federal Rules to Require Victim Input on Case Transfers
The passage outlines procedural proposals for victim participation in case transfer decisions. It does not name any influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct, offering only low‑value context Suggests amending Rule 18, 20, and 21 to require victim consultation before transferring prosecution Calls for written consent from defendants and approval from U.S. attorneys in both districts. Mand
Law Review Article Proposes Expansive Victim‑Rights Amendments to Federal Criminal Rules
The document is an academic commentary urging broader implementation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It discusses legislative history, proposed rule Calls for the Advisory Committee to adopt broader victim‑fairness language in Rules 2, 11, 12, 15, 3 Highlights Senate statements (Kyl, Feinstein) emphasizing victims' rights and fairness. Notes that
Law review article proposes extensive amendments to Federal Criminal Rules to implement Crime Victims' Rights Act
The document outlines policy proposals for rule changes but contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving specific powerful actors. It is a scholarly discussion, offering Identifies gaps in current Federal Rules where victims are barely mentioned. Cites legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and related statutes. Proposes specific rule amendments
FBI notified Epstein victims of CVRA rights before non‑prosecution agreement, suggesting DOJ misapplied victim‑rights statutes
The passage reveals that the FBI sent victim‑rights notices to Epstein’s alleged victims months before a non‑prosecution deal, implying the agency assumed CVRA applicability and later reversed its pos FBI sent a notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007, stating her rights under the CVRA. The notice preceded the non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein by over three months. The Department of Jus
Potential Secret Plea Deal in Epstein Case May Have Violated Victims' Rights Under the CVRA
The passage alleges that federal prosecutors entered into an agreement that barred prosecution of sex offenses against multiple Epstein victims without informing them, suggesting possible misconduct a The CVRA may extend victim participation rights to pre‑charging negotiations. Prosecutors allegedly reached a secret agreement that blocked federal prosecution of Epstein's sex o Victims (e.g., Jane
Scholarly Article Argues Crime Victims' Rights Act Applies Pre‑Charging, Citing Jeffrey Epstein Case
The passage outlines a legal argument that the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed, using the high‑profile Jeffrey Epstein case as an illustration. The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a 2011 memo limiting CVRA rights to post‑charging sta Sen. Jon Kyl publicly objected to the OLC memo, asserting CVRA rights attach during investigations
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.