Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26759House OversightPolice Report

Academic footnotes on federal vs. state jurisdiction in sexual assault and police misconduct cases

The passage consists of scholarly citations and general discussion of legal frameworks without naming specific individuals, transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers minimal investigative val Discusses federalism-based enforcement redundancy in crimes like sexual assault. References the Violence Against Women Act and its lack of federal criminal offenses. Notes federal statutes (e.g., 18

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016547
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of scholarly citations and general discussion of legal frameworks without naming specific individuals, transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers minimal investigative val Discusses federalism-based enforcement redundancy in crimes like sexual assault. References the Violence Against Women Act and its lack of federal criminal offenses. Notes federal statutes (e.g., 18

Tags

federalismpolice-misconductlegal-scholarshippolicy-analysiscivil-rights-statuteshouse-oversightlegal-frameworksexual-assault-law

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 38 of 42 103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *913 important kinds of crimes within states’ jurisdictions. This federalism-based model of enforcement redundancy is a distinctive if 188 Cassia Spohn & Julie Horney, Rape Law Reform: A Grassroots Revolution and Its Impact 77 (1992) (describing expectations that legal reforms would improve prosecution rates); id. at 100 ("Legal changes did not produce the dramatic results that were anticipated by reformers. The reforms had no impact in most of the jurisdictions."). 189 Jennifer L. Truman & Rachel E. Morgan, Bureau Justice Statistics, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Criminal Victimization, 2015, at 2 tbl.1 (2016), hittps://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvl5.pdf (reporting that the National Crime Victimization Survey estimated 431,840 rapes/sexual assaults in 2015); Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate Per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1996 -2015, Fed. Bureau Investigation, hittps://ucr fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/201 5/crime-in-the-u.s.-20] S/tables/table-] (last visited Oct. 30, 2018) (reporting 124,047 rape reports under the "revised definition"). 199 Cf. Jack M. Balkin & Reva B. Siegel, Principles, Practices, and Social Movements, /54 U. Pa. L. Rev. 927, 946-50 (2006) (arguing that social movements significantly shape the application of constitutional principles); Reva B. Siegel, Text in Contest: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective, /50 U. Pa. L. Rev. 279, 328-44 (2001) (arguing that the history of the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment show that the U.S. Constitution is amenable to contestation by social movements). °! Violence Against Women Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103-322 (1994) (codified at 34 U.S.C.§8$/2291-12511) (2017) (establishing a broad set of policies directed at violence against women that creates no federal criminal offenses). °2 Dripps, supra note 149, at 46-49, app. I. For an earlier proposal along the same lines, see Kim, supra note 149, at 304-09. 3 E.g., Office on Violence Against Women, supra note 178 and accompanying text. °4 The statutory authority is 42 U.S.C. § 1/414] (2016). °° See Harmon, Policing Reform, supra note 21 (discussing structural reform aimed at police violence without noting any instances of targeting sexual assault offenses). °° Leading observers view this structural reform as insufficient to address the scope of the police-misconduct problems. See id. at 59-61 (describing injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § /4/4/, noting limits on data about police misconduct, and explaining how insufficient data limits the effectiveness of reform efforts). On the prospect of reduced federal commitment to this strategy in the Trump administration, see U.S. Attorney Gen., supra note 24; Horwitz et al., supra note 24. 197 See Dripps, supra note 149, at 19 & n.100 (citing five federal actions under § 14141 addressing local agencies' responses to sexual assault crimes). 198 That is, federal criminal law is effective at successful prosecutions, if not at reducing the underlying social problem targeted by criminal law. See generally, e.g., Steven B. Duke & Albert C. Gross, America's Longest War: Rethinking Our Tragic Crusade Against Drugs (1993) (examining and critiquing American drug policies). 199 See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 241 (2012) (criminalizing conspiracy); id. § 242 (criminalizing willful deprivation of federal rights while acting under color of law); id. § 249 (criminalizing willful bodily injury because of victim's race, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity). Federal prosecutors focus on other serious direct-victim crimes as well, such as human trafficking and child pornography. See U.S. Dep't of Justice, supra note 145 (describing prioritization of such cases). But federal involvement in that realm is presumably motivated not so much by a need for oversight of untrustworthy state prosecutors as by the greater resources, expertise, and interstate jurisdictional advantages that federal prosecutors bring to such cases. Criminal prosecution is only one aspect of federal policies to reduce custodial deaths and improper uses of force by police. Other strategies include investigating abuse and corruption in local police agencies and using civil injunctive remedies against those agencies to change patterns of wrongdoing, as well as gathering data on custodial deaths and police uses of force. See Harmon, Policing Reform, supra note 21; Simone Weichselbaum, Policing the Police: As the Justice Department Pushes Reform, Some Changes Don't Last, Marshall Project (May 26, 2015), https:/Avww.themarshallproject.org/2015/04/23/policing -the-police (describing the difficulties in achieving lasting reforms in local police departments through federal consent decrees). 200 See 18 U.S.C. § 242 (liability for an official who "willfully subjects any person ... to the deprivation of any [federal] rights"); United States v. Screws, 325 U.S. 91, 103 (1945) (interpreting § 242's willfulness term to require "specific intent to deprive a person of a federal right"). 201 The prosecution of South Carolina police officer Michael Slager provides an example. State prosecutors charged Slager with murder; federal prosecutors charged him with criminal violation of civil rights under 18 U.S.C. § 242. For an example of this contrast between state and federal charges for the same offense, see Blinder, supra note 52; Michael S. Schmidt & Matt Apuzzo, Officer Is Charged with Murder of a Black Man Shot in the Back, N.Y. Times, Apr. 8, 2015, at Al. DAVID SCHOEN

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainavww.themarshallproject.org
Domainfbi.gov
Domainwww.bjs.gov
Wire Refreformers

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFeb 28, 2019

LexisNexis search record for law review article on prosecutorial oversight

LexisNexis search record for law review article on prosecutorial oversight The document is merely a metadata log of a LexisNexis search for a law review article. It contains no substantive allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. Key insights: Search conducted by user David Schoen on Feb 28, 2019; Article title: "Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute"; Search terms: cvra and sixth amendment

1p
House OversightUnknown

Academic footnotes on federal vs. state jurisdiction in sexual assault and police misconduct cases

Academic footnotes on federal vs. state jurisdiction in sexual assault and police misconduct cases The passage consists of scholarly citations and general discussion of legal frameworks without naming specific individuals, transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers minimal investigative value, low controversy, and no novel revelations about powerful actors. Key insights: Discusses federalism-based enforcement redundancy in crimes like sexual assault.; References the Violence Against Women Act and its lack of federal criminal offenses.; Notes federal statutes (e.g., 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 249) used to prosecute civil‑rights violations.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Law Review Article Discusses Enforcement Redundancy and Under‑enforcement in U.S. Criminal Justice

The passage is a scholarly analysis of prosecutorial discretion, under‑enforcement, and the role of federal‑state redundancy. It contains no specific allegations, transactions, dates, or names of indi Identifies ‘enforcement redundancy’ (federal‑state overlap, private prosecution, judicial review) as Notes that federal prosecutors often step in when state prosecutors decline to charge, especially

111p
House OversightJan 5, 2017

Sparse Investment Management Note Lacking Substantive Leads

Sparse Investment Management Note Lacking Substantive Leads The document contains only generic headings, a quote, and no specific names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking any powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Document appears to be an internal investment strategy note from January 2017.; Contains a philosophical quote attributed to Marcus Aurelius.; No mention of individuals, organizations, financial flows, or controversial actions.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Goldman Sachs Investment Strategy Group 2017 Outlook – Market Forecasts and Geopolitical Risks

The document is a broad economic and market outlook prepared by Goldman Sachs analysts. It contains no specific allegations, undisclosed transactions, or actionable intelligence about wrongdoing. It m Predicts continued US equity overweight despite high valuations. Highlights policy uncertainty under the incoming Trump administration, including possible tariffs an Notes China’s credit‑to‑GDP gap e

146p
House OversightUnknown

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.