Motion to Unseal Appellate Briefs in Jeffrey Epstein Appeal
Summary
The filing requests the unsealing of appellate briefs in the Jeffrey Epstein case, offering a concrete investigative step that could reveal new details about Epstein's network, financial arrangements, NYP Holdings, Inc. filed a motion on Jan 11 2019 to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s appeal (App The hearing was scheduled for Jan 21 2019, indicating the court’s willingness to consider disclosu
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case
The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was sig Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked in
Epstein Loan Linked to Townhome Sale Proceeds in Court Testimony
The passage hints that proceeds from a townhome sale, allegedly financed by a loan from Jeffrey Epstein, are unaccounted for and may have been moved outside the court's jurisdiction. While lacking con Witness mentions a loan from Jeffrey Epstein used for a townhome purchase. Unclear disposition of the townhome sale proceeds. Court acknowledges no evidence on where the money went.
Court denies addition of new Jane Does in lawsuit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement
The passage reveals a procedural fight over standing to challenge Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, indicating ongoing litigation that could expose details of the deal. While it does not provide ne Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejects their
Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell
The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals
Court denies addition of new Jane Doe plaintiffs in suit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement
The passage reveals a pending civil action that challenges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and mentions additional alleged victims (Jane Doe 3 and 4). While it does not provide new factual Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejected adding these
Witness Testimony Blocked Over Attorney-Client Privilege in Epstein-Related Trial
The passage suggests that key testimony about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and possibly former President Clinton is being suppressed by invoking attorney‑client privilege, indi Attorney‑client privilege is being used to block questions about Epstein and Maxwell. The court previously barred non‑Fifth Amendment questions about Dershowitz. Reference to “Clinton” and “other wor
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.