Court denies addition of new Jane Doe plaintiffs in suit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement
Summary
The passage reveals a pending civil action that challenges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and mentions additional alleged victims (Jane Doe 3 and 4). While it does not provide new factual Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejected adding these
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell
The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals
Court denies addition of new Jane Does in lawsuit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement
The passage reveals a procedural fight over standing to challenge Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, indicating ongoing litigation that could expose details of the deal. While it does not provide ne Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejects their
Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case
The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T
Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case
The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was sig Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked in
Court denies plaintiffs' attempt to link Saudi princes to al‑Qaida‑funding charities in 9/11 FSIA case
The passage reveals a procedural fight over alleged evidence that Prince Salman and Prince Naif knowingly funded terrorist charities, but the court found the evidence unauthenticated and rejected it. Plaintiffs sought to supplement the record with a 1998 Egyptian article alleging Saudi princes funde The court rejected the submission due to lack of authentication and timing issues. SHC (Saudi Huma
Court Dismisses Terrorism-Related Claims Against Al Rajhi Bank and Saudi American Bank, Citing Lack of Alleged Material Support Evidence
The passage outlines procedural rulings in a terrorism‑related civil suit involving major Saudi banks, noting the court’s dismissal of claims that the banks provided material support to al‑Qaeda. Whil District court dismissed Burnett ATA claim against Al Rajhi Bank and other ATA claims. Plaintiffs allege that Saudi American Bank knowingly provided material support to Osama bin Laden an Court found
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.