Trump‑appointed officials face DOJ probe over Jeffrey Epstein case handlingNonsensical boilerplate text with no actionable content
Case File
d-28859House OversightFinancial RecordBank Research Charts Highlight Shareholder Concentration and Management Priorities at FHB and GWB
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014333
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage provides internal banking research data on shareholder concentration (BNP's 82% stake) and management priorities for two regional banks, but it lacks concrete allegations, novel misconduct BNP holds 82% of outstanding shares in FHB, creating a liquidity overhang risk. Investors cite the large shareholder concentration as the top barrier to increasing exposure to FHB. Management at FHB
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
financial-researchregulatory-riskregulatory-costsfinancial-flowshareholder-concentrationbankinghouse-oversightinvestment-risk
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #014333
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Chart 29: What is the single biggest factor that would prevent you from buying or increasing
exposure to FHB?
45%
40%
35%
30%
29%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
FHB's premium valuation Exposure to the auto sector —_ Liquidity overhang tied to a
single large shareholder (BNP
owns 82% of shares o/s)
Chart 30: What would you like management to prioritize in 2017?
40% 38%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Managing core Increase its dividend Initiate a stock buyback Pursue M&A
expense growth to —_ payout to over 50% of program opportunities
under 2.5% earnings
Great Western Bancorp (GWB), B-1-7, Buy
GWB sees three potential benefits following the US presidential election
results. Chief Financial Officer Peter Chapman sounded optimistic that clarity
around the corporate tax policy could act as a much needed impetus to spur lending
activity. Secondly, current prospects for Head of Ag under the new administration
are viewed as a net positive for the industry. Lastly, while GWB has already begun
to see regulatory costs increase now that they’ve exceeded $10bn in assets,
management could see a potential for compliance costs to rationalize should the
new administration reform the regulatory framework.
= _Management’s revised growth rate outlook was meant to level set
expectations. During its 3Q16 earnings call, management tempered loan growth
expectations slightly to “mid-single” digits for FY16 vs. “mid-to-high” single digits.
Interestingly, this was the number one reason among investors polled as to why
they were hesitant to increase their exposure to GWB. That said, management
sounded optimistic about the growth opportunities within its AZ and CO markets.
While growth in C&I should see continued momentum, management noted
increased competition around pricing as banks tapped out of the CRE markets look
to make C&I loans. On CRE, GWB sees itself as a potential beneficiary from pullback
by some of its competitors. While management was generally constructive of the
Bankof America isa
Merrill Lynch 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 19
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.