Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29478House OversightOther

Proposed Rule Amendments to Expand Closed‑Circuit Broadcasts for Victims in Federal Criminal Cases

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017698
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage discusses a scholarly proposal to modify Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and incorporate victim‑rights statutes. It mentions no specific high‑level officials, financial transactions, o Advocates folding victim‑rights language (CVRA) into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Suggests allowing closed‑circuit transmission of trials beyond the current 350‑mile transfer limitat Cite

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

federal-rules-of-criminal-proccourt-broadcastinglegal-reformhouse-oversightvictim-rightsprocedural-rule-change
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 63 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *949 to give effect to these rights that does not unduly complicate or prolong the proceedings." *°7 Thus, in a situation where numerous victims might overwhelm courtroom seating capacity, the court might craft a reasonable alternative procedure to assure attendance rights. One such reasonable procedure would appear to be closed-circuit transmission of court proceedings to a facility sufficiently large to accommodate all the victims. This was the procedure followed in the Oklahoma City bombing case, 498 But tracking the CVRA is not enough. The language for my proposed rule comes from another statute, 42 U.S.C. ¢ 10608(a), which authorizes closed-circuit transmissions "notwithstanding any provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to the contrary" in cases in which a proceeding has been transferred more than 350 miles. 4°? The Advisory Committee repeatedly proposed folding language from the CVRA straight into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. But if the goal is to fold statutes into the Rules, other relevant victims’ statutes should be folded in as well. While folding in a provision on closed-circuit broadcasting, there appears to be no good reason to limit such transmissions to such situations where venue has been transferred. The CVRA mandates that the courts must always craft "reasonable procedures" to protect the rights of multiple victims. °° The proposed rule simply authorizes courts to allow such transmissions in appropriate cases. Interestingly, the CVRA's drafters specifically endorsed the closed-circuit procedure. >! [*950] For reasons that have yet to be articulated, the Advisory Committee has not only failed to act on my proposal but it has left in place a conflict between a statute and Rule 53. As noted above, 42 U.S.C. § /0608(a) specifically trumps Rule 53 in situations where cases have been transferred more than 350 miles. *°? The Rules should at least be amended to fix that conflict. 503 While fixing that problem, the Advisory Committee should also adopt my change, which faithfully implements the CVRA's commands. (New) Rule 60(a)(1) - Notice of Proceedings for Victims The Proposals: I proposed requiring federal prosecutors to give notice to crime victims of their rights and the court process as follows: Rule 10.1 Notice to Victims. (a) Identification of Victim. During the prosecution of a case, the attorney for the government shall, at the earliest reasonable opportunity, identify the victims of the crime. (b) Notice of Case Events. During the prosecution of a crime, the attorney for the government shall make reasonable efforts to provide victims the earliest possible notice of: 497 Proposed Amendments, supra note 71, R. 60(b)(3), at 24 (tracking 78 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(2) (2006)). 498 Jo Thomas, Trial To Be Shown in Oklahoma for Victims, N.Y. Times, Jan. 30, 1997, at A14; Paul G. Cassell & Robert F. Hoyt, The Tale of Victims’ Rights, Legal Times, Dec. 23, 1996, at 32. 499 42 USC. § 10608(a). 90 18 U.S.C. § 3771(A)(2). %0l See 150 Cong. Rec. $10912 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (noting that, because of multiple victims in the Oklahoma City bombing case, closed-circuit broadcasting used; this is "merely one example" of how a court could fashion an appropriate procedure to accommodate multiple victims). 502 42 US.C. § 10608(a). *03 Perhaps it could be argued that Rule 53 itself accommodates any conflict because its prohibition of broadcasting applies "except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules." Fed. R. Crim. P. 53. But reliance on that language is a bit odd because it should go without saying that nothing in the Rules can trump a substantive statute passed by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2072(b). Moreover, as a simple matter of drafting clarity, it is desirable to have the Rules themselves avoid conflicts with statutes. Otherwise, courts may inadvertently follow the Rules in violation of the statutory command. See, e.g., Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates, supra note 6, at 516 (recounting how this happened in the Oklahoma City bombing case). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.