Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29481House OversightOther

Federal Mail Censorship of Adult Magazines and Solitary Confinement of Activist William Combs

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015289
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage describes routine censorship of magazines and the solitary confinement of a low‑profile activist for possessing political literature. It mentions minor public figures (Bill Moyers, Ellen G Federal authorities reject certain magazines (e.g., Maxim, Stuff) on vague 'security' grounds. Mail rejection forms include a category for 'pubic hair'. Activist William Combs was placed in solitary

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

political-repressionmail-policycensorshipprison-conditionslegal-exposurehouse-oversightpolitical-activism
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
returned to sender on the claim they appeared to be for a course. MAPS [Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies]--their publication was sent back several times because maps are not allowed in here. High Times was repeatedly denied because it posed a danger to the safe, secure and orderly operation of the institution. ‘Smut mags’ like Hust/er are reviewed monthly.” * “There’ s a whole new genre of men’ s magazines--Maxim, Stuff, For Him--which show it all except for nipples and beaver. Now the feds want to ban Maxim due to ‘security’ reasons. The ‘rejected mail’ slip they send you when some verboten material arrives has boxes to check (to specify offending matter), one of which says ‘pubic hair.’ ” * “Peace activist William Combs spent eight days in_ solitary confinement for receiving and sharing with other inmates what federal authorities consider disruptive, if not subversive, political literature. The offending ‘propaganda’ included commentary by such extremists as Bill Moyers and Ellen Goodman, and included an article published in Reader’ s Digest. The common thread was that they all questioned the wisdom of government policy.”

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.