Jeffrey Epstein email chain discussing Middle‑East oil bets and connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and major financiersPersonal essay on the nature of evil with no actionable allegations
Case File
d-31763House OversightOtherSpeculative claims about Russian/Chinese intelligence recruitment of Edward Snowden and Putin’s motives
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020282
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage offers unverified speculation linking Putin and Russian intelligence to a calculated recruitment of Snowden, but provides no concrete dates, documents, or transactional evidence. It sugges Suggests Russian/Chinese intelligence may have learned of Snowden only after his June 9, 2013 video Claims Putin had up to 14 days to assess Snowden’s value before allowing him into Russia. Alleges
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
political-manipulationrussiansa-leaksforeign-influencechinaedward-snowdenputinhouse-oversightintelligence-recruitment
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #020282
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
130
It is also possible in this Hong Kong scenario that Russian or Chinese intelligence did not
become aware of Snowden until after he went public on June 9" 2013 by having the Guardian
release his video. At that point, if the Russians or Chinese had any doubts how dissatisfied he was
with the NSA, they would be dispelled by the video. Since dissatisfaction is one of the classic
means of recruitment in the intelligence business, he certainly would become a prime target for
recruitment after he went public. The CIA also considered the possibility that Snowden also
may have been reeled in unwittingly. Its Deputy Director, Michael Morell suggested in his book
that Snowden may not himself have fully realized “when and how he would be used.”
What can be safely assumed is that the decision made by Putin’s intelligence service to allow
Snowden to proceed to Russia proceeded from something other than soft-hearted sentiment about
his welfare. In addition, this decision was not made on the spur of the moment. After Putin
learned that there was an American in Hong Kong from the “special services” seeking to come to
Russia, he also learned from Snowden’s own disclosure on the video that he had taken to Hong
Kong a large number of NSA documents. After that self-outing by Snowden, Putin had at least 14
days to calculate the advantages and disadvantages of allowing him to come to Moscow. To be
sure, we don’t know the precise date of Snowden’s first contact with Russian officials in Hong
Kong. Putin reframed from specifying when Snowden first met them. But whenever it was, we
know that he was deemed important enough by the Russian intelligence service for it to bring him
to the personal attention of Putin.
Putin could offer him not only his freedom from arrest but a platform to express his views.
The exploitation of an intelligence defector, even after he yields his secrets documents, can also
be part of an intelligence operation. General Alexander, who ran the NSA during this period,
concluded that Putin was playing a deep game with Snowden by “looking to capitalize on the fact
that his [Snowden’s] actions are enormously disruptive and damaging to US interests.” This
game, if Alexander’s assessment in correct, might provide Putin with ample reason to have his
representatives in Hong Kong offer Snowden an exfiltration deal.
Snowden hardly was not in any position to refuse such a deal. After the release of the video
release, there was no going back to America without his facing a determined criminal prosecution.
If he had researched the issue, he would have known that in every prior case, intelligence
workers who had released even a single classified document had gone to prison. As his Internet
postings show, he had closely followed the ordeal of Bradley Manning, whose trial was coming to
its conclusion while Snowden was in Hong Kong. So he likely knew that even though the
documents Manning had sent to Wikileaks were far less damaging than those Snowden had taken.
Manning had been kept in solitary confinement under horrific conditions for over a year while
awaiting his trial and was facing a long prison sentence. (Manning was subsequently sentenced to
35 years in prison.) There was no reason for Snowden to expect a better outcome for himself if
he returned to the US or was arrested in Hong Kong or any other place that had an extradition
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.