Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31784House OversightOther

Proposed Amendments to Federal Criminal Procedure Rules Following the 2004 Crime Victims' Rights Act

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017715
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines scholarly proposals for rule changes after the CVRA, mentioning President Bush’s signature but provides no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It is a routine po Mentions President Bush signing the Crime Victims' Rights Act in 2004. Highlights the near‑absence of victim rights in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Proposes comprehensive rule revisions t

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

policy-proposalcriminal-procedurepolicy-reformlegal-reformhouse-oversightlegislationvictims-rights
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ARTICLE: Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act 2005 Reporter 2005 B.Y.ULL. Rev. 835 * Length: 36451 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law for the S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah and United States District Court Judge for the District of Utah. Thanks to Doug Beloof, Janna Tucker Davis, Meg Garvin, Wendy Murphy, Judge James Orenstein, and Steve Twist; to my able law clerks Ann Bauer, Tim Conde, Tyler Green, Felise Thorpe Moll, Justin Starr, and Stewart Young; and especially to my wife Trish for all her support. I write this article as a law professor, not as a judge. It is not intended to comment on any pending cases and implies no positive commitment on legal issues that may arise in cases that come before me in my court. Text [*837] I. Introduction Crime victims are virtually absent from the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The sixty federal rules comprehensively cover every aspect of federal criminal proceedings - from initial appearance through preliminary hearing, arraignment, acceptance of pleas, trial, and sentencing. Yet the rules substantively mention victims only once, briefly recognizing the right of some victims to speak at sentencing. ! The federal rules can no longer leave victims unmentioned. In October 2004, Congress passed and President Bush signed into law the Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). ? The CVRA transforms crime victims into participants in the criminal justice process by (among other things) guaranteeing them notice of court hearings, the right to attend those hearings, and the opportunity to testify at appropriate points in the process. These new victims’ rights will reshape the federal criminal justice system and force significant changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to reflect the victim's expanded role. This Article offers comprehensive proposals for changing the federal rules to both implement the CVRA and reflect sound public policy. The CVRA dictates changes like these to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure because only by integrating victims into the federal rules will Congress's goal of making victims participants in the process be fully realized. This Article 1s divided into five parts. Following this introduction, Part II reviews the current absence of victims from the federal rules. Surprisingly, even where the rules cover issues of great concern to victims, victims somehow go unmentioned. ' See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(4)(B); discussion infra note 3 and accompanying text. ? Crime Victims’ Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 178 Stat. 2261 (2004) (codified at /8 U.S.C.A. 3771 (West 2004 & Supp. 2005)). The CVRA was part of a much larger piece of legislation that addressed a variety of subjects, known as the "Justice for All Act.” See generally Steven J. Twist, On the Wings of Their Angels: The Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. (forthcoming 2005). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Analysis of OLC Memorandum on CVRA Rights and Pre‑Charging Victim Protections

The passage critiques the Office of Legal Counsel’s interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, focusing on statutory language and procedural arguments. It does not identify specific individuals, OLC argues CVRA rights apply only after criminal charges are filed. The author counters that several CVRA rights (protection, attorney conference, dignity) can apply pr Reference to VRRA and Attorney

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input Before Waiving Jury Trials in Federal Courts

The passage discusses academic proposals to amend procedural rules regarding victim participation in jury waiver decisions. It mentions no specific powerful individuals, agencies, or financial transac Advocates suggest courts must consider victims' views before approving a defendant's written jury wa Current Rule 23 does not require victim input; proposed amendment would add this requirement. Advi

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Amend Federal Rules for Victim Access to Presentence Reports

The passage discusses procedural reforms for victim disclosure of presentence reports, offering no concrete leads involving high‑profile individuals, financial flows, or misconduct. It lacks actionabl Three disclosure models: complete, selective, and through prosecutors. Proposes victim‑initiated request for report access via prosecutor. Suggests amending Rule 32(f), (h), (i) to allow objections w

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Legal analysis limits defendants' ability to subpoena victim information under CVRA

The passage discusses case law and statutory interpretation regarding victim privacy and subpoena rights. It does not identify specific individuals, transactions, or misconduct, nor does it provide ac Court rulings generally prohibit pre‑trial disclosure of victim identities and personal records. The CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) supersedes older authority allowing disclosure of government wi F

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Legal Argument for Victims' Access to Presentence Reports under CVRA

The passage discusses statutory interpretation and victim rights in sentencing, citing congressional statements and case law. It does not introduce new allegations, financial flows, or misconduct invo Victims argue they should see presentence reports to meaningfully participate in sentencing. Citations of Senator Feinstein and Senator Kyl supporting broad victim rights. Reference to a magistrate j

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.