Proposed Amendments to Federal Criminal Procedure Rules Following the 2004 Crime Victims' Rights Act
Summary
The passage outlines scholarly proposals for rule changes after the CVRA, mentioning President Bush’s signature but provides no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It is a routine po Mentions President Bush signing the Crime Victims' Rights Act in 2004. Highlights the near‑absence of victim rights in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Proposes comprehensive rule revisions t
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
“...justice system and force significant changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to reflect the victim's expanded role. This Article offers comprehensive proposals for changing the federal rules to both...”
United States“...l G. Cassell* * Professor of Law for the S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah and United States District Court Judge for the District of Utah. Thanks to Doug Beloof, Janna Tucker Davis, Meg Garvi...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Analysis of OLC Memorandum on CVRA Rights and Pre‑Charging Victim Protections
The passage critiques the Office of Legal Counsel’s interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, focusing on statutory language and procedural arguments. It does not identify specific individuals, OLC argues CVRA rights apply only after criminal charges are filed. The author counters that several CVRA rights (protection, attorney conference, dignity) can apply pr Reference to VRRA and Attorney
Proposal to Require Victim Input Before Waiving Jury Trials in Federal Courts
The passage discusses academic proposals to amend procedural rules regarding victim participation in jury waiver decisions. It mentions no specific powerful individuals, agencies, or financial transac Advocates suggest courts must consider victims' views before approving a defendant's written jury wa Current Rule 23 does not require victim input; proposed amendment would add this requirement. Advi
Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion
The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right
Proposal to Amend Federal Rules for Victim Access to Presentence Reports
The passage discusses procedural reforms for victim disclosure of presentence reports, offering no concrete leads involving high‑profile individuals, financial flows, or misconduct. It lacks actionabl Three disclosure models: complete, selective, and through prosecutors. Proposes victim‑initiated request for report access via prosecutor. Suggests amending Rule 32(f), (h), (i) to allow objections w
Legal analysis limits defendants' ability to subpoena victim information under CVRA
The passage discusses case law and statutory interpretation regarding victim privacy and subpoena rights. It does not identify specific individuals, transactions, or misconduct, nor does it provide ac Court rulings generally prohibit pre‑trial disclosure of victim identities and personal records. The CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) supersedes older authority allowing disclosure of government wi F
Legal Argument for Victims' Access to Presentence Reports under CVRA
The passage discusses statutory interpretation and victim rights in sentencing, citing congressional statements and case law. It does not introduce new allegations, financial flows, or misconduct invo Victims argue they should see presentence reports to meaningfully participate in sentencing. Citations of Senator Feinstein and Senator Kyl supporting broad victim rights. Reference to a magistrate j
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.