Alleged DOJ Mishandling of Notification Letter Regarding Jeffrey Epstein Victims
Summary
The passage suggests possible government misconduct in sending a misleading letter to alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein, involving senior DOJ officials (AAG Fisher, AUSA Acosta) and raises questions Defense raised 14 substantive objections to a DOJ notification letter about Epstein victims. AAG Fisher intervened to halt the letter's transmission. AUSA Acosta admitted the cited Justice for All Ac
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Petitioners claim U.S. government failed to consult victims before non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the federal government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein without informing the victims, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officials. It pro Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstei Claim that victims were not c
FOIA request by National Enquirer seeking DOJ records on Jeffrey Epstein's alleged blackmail and preferential treatment
The passage reveals a formal FOIA request that specifically asks whether Epstein's wealth and connections secured favorable treatment by the Department of Justice, hinting at possible government misco FOIA request cites possible DOJ favoritism toward Epstein References 2006 lawsuit alleging Epstein recorded sexual activity for blackmail Mentions ongoing defamation trial involving Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge to rule on sealed plea-deal papers today
The passage reveals a sealed federal non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, indicating potential undisclosed terms that could implicate government officials or reveal how the deal was negotia Federal non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein was sealed in state court. Judge Jeffrey Colbath will decide whether to unseal the agreement. Attorney Jack Goldberger argues for continued secrecy citi
Jane Doe plaintiffs allege secret non‑prosecution agreement between U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein
The passage hints at a concealed government‑Epstein agreement (an NPA) that could be a significant investigative lead, but provides no concrete details—no dates, officials, or transaction data—making Four Jane Doe plaintiffs claim the government executed a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with The alleged NPA was allegedly concealed from victims and is the basis of the lawsuit. The plaintif
Petitioners claim U.S. Government violated Crime Victims’ Rights Act by not consulting them before a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the Department of Justice negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein without victim input, suggesting possible misconduct or concealment at a high level. Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. Government failed to consult victims before an NPA with Jeffrey Epstein. The case was filed in July 2008
Flight logs and civil lawsuits reveal high‑level political figures on Jeffrey Epstein’s jets and alleged government misconduct in victim notifications
The passage cites specific flight‑log evidence linking former President Bill Clinton, former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, former Colombian President Andrés Pastrana, and attorney Alan Dersh April 2010 flight logs obtained in civil suits list Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger, Andrés Pastrana, and March 2011 victims filed a motion alleging the DOJ concealed a plea deal and failed to notify them
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.