Judge to rule on sealed plea-deal papers today
Summary
The passage reveals a sealed federal non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, indicating potential undisclosed terms that could implicate government officials or reveal how the deal was negotia Federal non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein was sealed in state court. Judge Jeffrey Colbath will decide whether to unseal the agreement. Attorney Jack Goldberger argues for continued secrecy citi
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures
The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s
Petition to Reopen Jeffrey Epstein Teen Sex Case Targets Federal Government Over Plea Deal
The passage reveals a legal effort to force a federal judge to reopen the Epstein case, implicating U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra and federal officials for potentially violating the Crime Victims' Attorneys filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jane Does seeking to overturn Epstein's 2008 plea deal. The suit alleges federal officials violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims o
Allegations of Private Investigator Intimidation and Prosecutorial Deal in Jeffrey Epstein Case
The passage provides specific leads: a private investigator linked to intimidation of victims' families, a proposed plea deal offering Epstein probation and no record, and statements from Epstein's at Two men intimidating victims' parents were driving vehicles registered to private investigators. Attorney Jack Goldberger denied knowledge of the investigators' actions. State attorney's office alleg
Petitioners claim U.S. government failed to consult victims before non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the federal government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein without informing the victims, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officials. It pro Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstei Claim that victims were not c
FOIA request by National Enquirer seeking DOJ records on Jeffrey Epstein's alleged blackmail and preferential treatment
The passage reveals a formal FOIA request that specifically asks whether Epstein's wealth and connections secured favorable treatment by the Department of Justice, hinting at possible government misco FOIA request cites possible DOJ favoritism toward Epstein References 2006 lawsuit alleging Epstein recorded sexual activity for blackmail Mentions ongoing defamation trial involving Ghislaine Maxwell
Alleged DOJ Mishandling of Notification Letter Regarding Jeffrey Epstein Victims
The passage suggests possible government misconduct in sending a misleading letter to alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein, involving senior DOJ officials (AAG Fisher, AUSA Acosta) and raises questions Defense raised 14 substantive objections to a DOJ notification letter about Epstein victims. AAG Fisher intervened to halt the letter's transmission. AUSA Acosta admitted the cited Justice for All Ac
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.