Government claims two Jeffrey Epstein victims were complicit, challenging their victim status in 2008 lawsuit
Summary
The passage reveals a new government position that two alleged victims were allegedly paid to recruit others for Epstein, which could affect the non‑prosecution agreement and victim‑rights claims. It Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee asserted two plaintiffs were complicit and therefore not victims The claim could undermine the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal ch
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Jane Doe plaintiffs allege secret non‑prosecution agreement between U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein
The passage hints at a concealed government‑Epstein agreement (an NPA) that could be a significant investigative lead, but provides no concrete details—no dates, officials, or transaction data—making Four Jane Doe plaintiffs claim the government executed a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with The alleged NPA was allegedly concealed from victims and is the basis of the lawsuit. The plaintif
Women challenge prosecutors' plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein; Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz named in related court filings
The passage links high‑profile figures (Prince Andrew, a senior British royal, and Alan Dershowitz, a prominent U.S. attorney) to alleged misconduct surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case and mentions a Women plaintiffs are seeking to overturn the 2009 Epstein plea deal that limited federal charges. Prince Andrew is specifically identified as a person of interest in the allegations. Attorney Alan De
Federal prosecutors defend 2007 non‑prosecution deal with Jeffrey Epstein amid victim lawsuits
The passage provides concrete details about the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement, including dates, the Assistant U.S. Attorney (Marie Villafana), the judge (Kenneth Marra), and references to former Soli Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafana authored a sworn affidavit describing the DOJ’s decision‑mak The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges while avoiding federal
Former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and prosecutor A. Marie Villafaria allegedly concealed victim information in Jeffrey Epstein plea deal
The passage links a high‑ranking former cabinet official (Alex Acosta, then U.S. Secretary of Labor) and a senior federal prosecutor to alleged misconduct in the Epstein case, citing court orders, jud Judge William J. Zloch rebuked prosecutor A. Marie Villafaria for withholding victim history in a 20 Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, defended Villafaria’s actions and
Jeffrey Epstein’s secret 2008 non‑prosecution deal with U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta raises questions of political influence and possible misconduct
The passage identifies a concrete plea‑deal negotiated by former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labor Secretary) that shielded Epstein from federal trafficking charges. It names specific actors ( Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in Miami in 2008, approved a secret non‑prosecution deal for Epstein. Acosta is now Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration, creating a potential conflict of inter Vic
Petitioners claim U.S. government failed to consult victims before non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the federal government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein without informing the victims, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officials. It pro Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstei Claim that victims were not c
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.