Skip to content
Case File
d-37912House OversightOther

Jeffrey Epstein’s secret 2008 non‑prosecution deal with U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta raises questions of political influence and possible misconduct

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #029518
Pages
2
Persons
3

Summary

The passage identifies a concrete plea‑deal negotiated by former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labor Secretary) that shielded Epstein from federal trafficking charges. It names specific actors ( Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in Miami in 2008, approved a secret non‑prosecution deal for Epstein. Acosta is now Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration, creating a potential conflict of inter Vic

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

financial-flow-settlementsprince-andrewalexander-acostajeffrey-epsteinsex-traffickingpolitical-influencenonprosecution-agreementbill-clintontrump-administrationlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightvictim-rights
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein settlement article linking Alexander Acosta, Clinton, Prince Andrew, and other elites to secret plea deal

The passage mentions a secret 2008 non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein that was approved by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, now Labor Secretary, and repeats known but still unverified connections to Epstein allegedly struck a secret non‑prosecution deal in 2008 approved by U.S. Attorney Alexander A Acosta later became Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration. The article repeats claims tha

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal

The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal Involving U.S. Attorney’s Office and Potential Political Pressure

The passage details a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that was allegedly influenced by pressure on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, referencing former Attorney General Ale Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta acknowledged a "year‑long assault" on the prosecution by Eps

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami Herald article cites Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein

The passage identifies a concrete legal maneuver— a non‑prosecution agreement signed by a sitting U.S. Attorney that effectively shelved a federal indictment— linking a high‑ranking official (Acosta) FBI prepared a 53‑page federal indictment against Epstein in 2007. Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed a non‑prosecution agreement that sealed the indictment. Epstein received a reduced state

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former top aide to Jeffrey Epstein prosecutor defends Alexander Acosta and alleges secret plea deal

The passage provides a named former assistant (Jeffrey H. Sloman) who claims the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein was secret, involved political pressure, and mentions President Donald Trump Sloman, former second‑in‑command to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, says the 2008 Epstein plea deal He alleges political pressure from President Donald Trump and other senior officials to secure the

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alexander Acosta's internal communications and public statements on the Jeffrey Epstein case

The fragment suggests that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta authored a letter to the public about the Epstein investigation and that internal Department of Justice communications were referenced Acosta wrote a public letter regarding the Epstein case, acknowledging state charges were insufficie He references privileged internal DOJ communications he cannot discuss. The text hints at a possib

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.