Skip to content
Case File
d-34416House OversightOther

Lawmakers demand probe of Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution deal

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022463
Pages
3
Persons
3

Summary

The passage links a senior cabinet official (Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta) to a secret plea agreement that granted immunity to Jeffrey Epstein, a high‑profile sex‑trafficking suspect. It cites Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved a non‑prosecution agreemen More than 30 senators and representatives, including Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Patty Murray, have

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

alexander-acostajeffrey-epsteinsex-traffickinginspector-generalfinancial-flow-pleadeal-negotiforeign-influence-potential-ovgovernment-misconducthigh-importancenonprosecution-agreementlegal-exposurehouse-oversightcongressional-oversightdepartment-of-justice
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Deal Between U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein Shielded Powerful Figures

The passage describes a secret non‑prosecution agreement that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to serve only 13 months and granted immunity to unnamed co‑conspirators, potentially including high‑level politica Acosta, as U.S. Attorney, negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Epstein in 2007‑2008. The NPA granted immunity to unnamed “potential co‑conspirators,” hinting at other powerful individua E

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami Herald article cites Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein

The passage identifies a concrete legal maneuver— a non‑prosecution agreement signed by a sitting U.S. Attorney that effectively shelved a federal indictment— linking a high‑ranking official (Acosta) FBI prepared a 53‑page federal indictment against Epstein in 2007. Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed a non‑prosecution agreement that sealed the indictment. Epstein received a reduced state

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alexander Acosta's internal communications and public statements on the Jeffrey Epstein case

The fragment suggests that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta authored a letter to the public about the Epstein investigation and that internal Department of Justice communications were referenced Acosta wrote a public letter regarding the Epstein case, acknowledging state charges were insufficie He references privileged internal DOJ communications he cannot discuss. The text hints at a possib

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney's Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case; DOJ Probe into Former Attorney Alexander Acosta

The passage identifies concrete actions—recusal of Miami prosecutors, reassignment to the Atlanta U.S. Attorney (Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump appointee), and an ongoing DOJ Office of Professional Resp Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in March 2019. Case reassigned to U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump‑ J

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement with U.S. Attorney’s Office includes immunity for co‑conspirators and alleged violations

The passage reveals a federal non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Jeffrey Epstein and his co‑conspirators from federal charges, mentions direct involvement of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and s Epstein signed a non‑prosecution agreement on Sep 24, 2007 with the Southern District of Florida, av The agreement allegedly protected co‑conspirators, including Nadia Marcinkova, from prosecution. A

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Letter Defends Alexander Acosta’s Role in Jeffrey Epstein Plea Deal

The passage repeats already‑public claims that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta oversaw Epstein’s 2007 plea deal and that the decision was based on legal impediments, not a high‑priced defense. I Letter authored by current/former Epstein lawyers defending Acosta’s actions. Claims the plea deal was reviewed at multiple DOJ levels and was standard practice. Cites former Southern District first

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.