Skip to content
Case File
d-20842House OversightOther

Miami U.S. Attorney's Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case; DOJ Probe into Former Attorney Alexander Acosta

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031384
Pages
3
Persons
3

Summary

The passage identifies concrete actions—recusal of Miami prosecutors, reassignment to the Atlanta U.S. Attorney (Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump appointee), and an ongoing DOJ Office of Professional Resp Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in March 2019. Case reassigned to U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump‑ J

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

victims-rightsalexander-acostajeffrey-epsteinprosecutorial-misconductgovernment-oversightvictims-rights-violationattorney-recusallegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightcongressional-oversightdepartment-of-justice
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney recuses from Jeffrey Epstein case; DOJ probe into former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s handling

The passage identifies concrete leads: the recusal of the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, the reassignment of the victims' rights case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. "BJay" Pak (Trump appointee), and an ongo Miami U.S. Attorney's Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case. Case reassigned to U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump Former

3p
House OversightPlea AgreementNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney Recuses from Epstein Case Amid Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Sealed Plea Deal

The passage reveals that the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case, cites a sealed plea agreement overseen by former Attorney Alexander Acosta (appointed by Trump), Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein case and reassigned it to the Atlanta o Former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, a Trump appointee, allegedly met privately with Epstein’s l

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney's Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case; DOJ Probe Targets Former Attorney Alexander Acosta

The passage identifies concrete actions (recusal, case reassignment to U.S. Attorney Byung J. "BJay" Pak, DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility investigation of Alexander Acosta) and names high‑pr Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in March 2019. Case reassigned to the Northern District of Georgia U.S. Attorney Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump appoi J

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal and Victims’ CVRA Rights Challenge

The passage outlines a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that involved high‑level officials (U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and raises legal questions under the Crime Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, admitted a “year‑long assault on the prosecution” by Epstein. Victims

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal

The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alexander Acosta's internal communications and public statements on the Jeffrey Epstein case

The fragment suggests that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta authored a letter to the public about the Epstein investigation and that internal Department of Justice communications were referenced Acosta wrote a public letter regarding the Epstein case, acknowledging state charges were insufficie He references privileged internal DOJ communications he cannot discuss. The text hints at a possib

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.