FBI memo requesting victim notification for Jeffrey Epstein's 2006 sexual abuse investigationCourt rulings expand victims' rights under CVRA to pre‑charge proceedings, potentially affecting Epstein non‑prosecution agreement
Case File
d-35451House OversightOtherMedicaid Funding Pressures on State Budgets and Federal ARRA Support
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020891
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage outlines general fiscal challenges of Medicaid financing and the temporary nature of ARRA assistance. It contains no specific allegations, transactions, or individuals that could be pursue State Medicaid costs represent ~21% of state spending, varying widely by state. Higher‑income states bear about half of Medicaid costs; lower‑income states bear less. Medicaid enrollment growth is dr
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
arrafederal-stimulusstate-budgetspolicy-impactmedicaidbudgetary-riskhouse-oversighthealthcare-financing
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #020891
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Medicaid: While We Focus on Federal Government Dynamics, It’s Notable
that State Government Medicaid Funding Also Faces Significant Challenges
e Medicaid = Major and Growing Expense Line Item for State Governments
- Medicaid funding responsibility is shared between federal & state governments. States with higher
per-capita income (like New York) pay ~50% of total Medicaid cost while states with lower per-capita
income (like Mississippi) pay ~22%.
- Onaverage, Medicaid accounted for 21% of total state spending in F2009 (ranging from Missouri at
35% to Alaska at 8%). Enrollment growth has been accelerating, in part, owing to more people losing
employer-sponsored health insurance in the recession, and thus overall Medicaid costs jumped ~11%
Y/Y from October, 2009 to June, 2010.
- State governments (which unlike the federal government must balance their annual budgets) cannot
pay for such elevated levels of Medicaid and maintain normal spending levels for other services (like
education and public safety).
e Enter the Federal Government
- ARRA (2009 economic stimulus) provided ~$100 billion in support for the states to pay for elevated
levels of Medicaid costs and to avoid large budget cuts in education and public safety. This went a
long way toward holding down the states’ contribution, but it is a one-time unsustainable fix.
e Federal Support May Be Expiring by June, 2011
- Ifno action is taken, the Medicaid-related cost burden on the states will rise dramatically in coming
years. As aresult, many states are on the verge of implementing Medicaid cost containment plans
that include cuts in doctor payments, benefit limitations, higher patient co-payments, etc. Moreover,
many states are fearful that the recently enacted healthcare reform will lead to additional Medicaid-
related costs when it goes into full effect in 2014.
KP Data Source: National Conference of State Legislatures, “State Budget Update: July 2009.”
(@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 99
Rising Debt Periodic Large
, Level & Interest One-Time
Spend
pend Payments Charges
Entitlement
Note: *denotes F2010 net income / net loss of respective programs, data per White House OMB. 1) Medicare and Social Security net loss
excludes Trust Fund interest income. 2) TARP net loss includes proceeds from sale of warrants. TARP is Troubled Asset Relief Program; ARRA
KP is American Recovery & Reinvestment Act programs.
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 100
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.