Defendant threatens Jane Doe No. 3 with perjury prosecution and media campaign
Summary
The passage contains only vague accusations and media quotes about a private litigation dispute. It does not name any high‑profile officials, corporations, or foreign actors, nor does it provide concr Defendant claims Jane Doe No. 3 will be jailed for perjury. Defendant publicly called Jane Doe No. 3 a “prostitute” and “bad mother.” Defendant threatened to sue Jane Doe No. 3 for defamation and to
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01695623
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendant. Case No. 1:22-CV-10019 (JSR) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF (1) MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION AND (2) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES Booms SCHILLER FLOWER LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 Telephone: (212) 446-2300 Fax: (212) 446-2350 EDWARDB HENDERSON LEHRMAN LLC 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 524-2820 Counsel for Class Representative Jane Doe I and the Class EFTA00145643 Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 256 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE CLASS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORTS THE SETTLEMENT 2 III. THE COURT SHOULD OVERRULE JANE DOE 7'S OBJECT
EFTA Document EFTA01368193
Page 20 of 32 The motion claimed that the woman. who was not identified in court documents, had sexual relations as a minor with Prince Andrew in London. New York and on Mr. Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein told the woman to give the prince 'Whatever he demanded" and 'report back to him on the details? the motion said. Buckingham Palace took the unusual step of issuing a statement to rebut the accusations "This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil procee
EFTA01308033
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.