Generic Cryptocurrency Overview from Investment Strategy GroupInsightsPod marketing research business plan describing political sentiment analysis services
Case File
d-36461House OversightOtherReading list for a digital policy introductory course
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #024259
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The document only provides a syllabus of public readings on internet governance and does not mention any individuals, transactions, or allegations that could serve as investigative leads. Lists academic and policy texts on internet architecture, regulation, and the right to be forgotten. Includes URLs and perma.cc archives for source verification.
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
internet-governanceeducationhouse-oversightdigital-policyreading-list
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #024259
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Reading Assignments
Day 1: Introduction
Welcome! We aspire to the implausible: a nine-day introduction to the unusual dynamics of the
world’s digital space, sufficient for a strategic understanding of what makes it difficult (but far
from impossible) to regulate or shape; who’s trying to do it nonetheless; and how such efforts
have fared over the past twenty years, with an eye towards lessons for influencing the space
and the behavior within it today.
In addition to offering some frameworks for thinking about Internet architecture and policy, and
the curious open and generative nature of the phenomenon, we will delve into the net as a
contingently global phenomenon, and the way that complicates regulation by traditional
sovereigns. Our case study will be the current debates around implementation of Europe’s “right
to be forgotten” in search engine results. As you complete the readings, you might see how
you'd answer the question of what a state like France’s view should be towards the scope of its
RTBF regulation, and whether the kind of “zoning” described in the Cato Institute article from
thirteen years ago (!), is realizable and desirable.
Readings:
e C.P. Snow, “The Rede Lecture: The Two Cultures,” (1959) pages 1-9
http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/2cultures/Rede-lecture-2-cultures.pdf archived at
https://perma.cc/XB6F-N9K8.
e John Perry Barlow, “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace,” Electronic
Frontier Foundation (February 8, 1996) https:/Awww.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
archived at https://perma.cc/H2CZ-N2EX.
e Locke, Levine, Searles, & Weinberger, The Cluetrain Manifesto: 95 Theses (1999)
http://www.cluetrain.com/book/95-theses.html archived at https://perma.cc/2BLT-6ZEL.
e Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven: 2008
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4455262/Zittrain Future%200f%20the%201
nternet.pdf?sequence=1 archived at https://perma.cc/NM9D-7Y2V.
o Read pages 1-5, 7-9, 57-61, 63-65, 67-71.
e Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks. New Haven: 2006.
http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth Of Networks.pdf archived at
https://perma.cc/BC4A-96KP.
o Read pages 154 (beginning “Imagine a world”) - 161
Jurisdiction
e Jonathan Zittrain, “Be Careful What You Ask For: Reconciling a Global Internet and
Local Law,” WHO RULES THE NET?, Cato Institute (2003)
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/2003-03.pdf archived at
https://perma.cc/3JE9-GM3R.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.