Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal Involving U.S. Attorney’s Office and Potential Political Pressure
Summary
The passage details a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that was allegedly influenced by pressure on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, referencing former Attorney General Ale Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta acknowledged a "year‑long assault" on the prosecution by Eps
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Former top aide to Jeffrey Epstein prosecutor defends Alexander Acosta and alleges secret plea deal
The passage provides a named former assistant (Jeffrey H. Sloman) who claims the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein was secret, involved political pressure, and mentions President Donald Trump Sloman, former second‑in‑command to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, says the 2008 Epstein plea deal He alleges political pressure from President Donald Trump and other senior officials to secure the
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal
The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail
Calls to Unseal Epstein‑Maxwell Documents Highlight DOJ Non‑Prosecution Deal and Potential Links to Powerful Figures
The passage outlines concrete legal actions (appeals deadline, motions, judge orders) and identifies specific actors—Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labo Second Circuit appeals panel set a March 29 deadline for additional pleadings on unsealing Maxwell‑r U.S. Attorney Byung Pak’s recent filing argues victims have no legal right to demand disclosure, p
Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal and Victims’ CVRA Rights Challenge
The passage outlines a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that involved high‑level officials (U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and raises legal questions under the Crime Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, admitted a “year‑long assault on the prosecution” by Epstein. Victims
Jeffrey Epstein’s secret 2008 non‑prosecution deal with U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta raises questions of political influence and possible misconduct
The passage identifies a concrete plea‑deal negotiated by former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labor Secretary) that shielded Epstein from federal trafficking charges. It names specific actors ( Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in Miami in 2008, approved a secret non‑prosecution deal for Epstein. Acosta is now Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration, creating a potential conflict of inter Vic
Miami Herald article cites Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein
The passage identifies a concrete legal maneuver— a non‑prosecution agreement signed by a sitting U.S. Attorney that effectively shelved a federal indictment— linking a high‑ranking official (Acosta) FBI prepared a 53‑page federal indictment against Epstein in 2007. Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed a non‑prosecution agreement that sealed the indictment. Epstein received a reduced state
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.