Skip to content
Case File
d-573House OversightLegal Filing

The government argues that the indictment is valid and timely, contrary to the defendant's claims, c...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-573
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The government argues that the indictment is valid and timely, contrary to the defendant's claims, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3283 for the statute of limitations. The government also asserts that the defendant poses a significant risk of flight due to her international ties, financial resources, and lack of ties to the United States.

Tags

Indictment charges and their relation to a prior investigationStatute of limitations for the charges broughtRisk of flight assessment for the defendant
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and A...

The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and Assistant United States Attorneys, arguing that the defendant's renewed bail motion should be denied due to the risk of flight. The court had previously found that the defendant poses a substantial actual risk of flight, and the government asserts that no conditions of bail can mitigate this risk. The motion is dated December 16, 2020.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document discusses the government's opposition to the defendant's release on bail, arguing that ...

The document discusses the government's opposition to the defendant's release on bail, arguing that her ties to the United States are weak and that she has the means and foreign connections to flee. The government also disputes the defendant's claim that she can irrevocably waive her extradition rights.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, a...

The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, arguing that the proposed bail conditions are insufficient to mitigate the risk of flight. The government contends that the court should deny the motion due to the defendant's continued risk of flight. The document is signed by Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, and several Assistant United States Attorneys.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government opposes the defendant's request to use certain discovery materials from the criminal ...

The government opposes the defendant's request to use certain discovery materials from the criminal case in related civil cases, arguing that the defendant has not shown a compelling reason to permit such use and that it would be an improper circumvention of the protective order in the criminal case. The government contends that the materials are not relevant to the civil cases and that the defendant's true intention is to falsely accuse the government and a recipient of malfeasance. The government's opposition is presented in a letter to the court, signed by Assistant United States Attorneys.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.