Skip to content
Case File
d-586House OversightDeposition

The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-586
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a Westlaw report concerning a juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms that the report matches the juror's information provided to the firm before voir dire.

Persons Referenced (3)

Tags

Witness testimonyJury listWestlaw report
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5735

The witness, Brune, testifies that they were not included in email traffic related to Catherine Conrad and does not recall being made aware of it. The discussion involves a note that prompted additional research and a dispute about the timing of an email sent by Ms. Trzaskoma.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition: Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 34 of 130

The witness, Brune, discusses a conversation about Catherine Conrad, a potential juror, and how the jury consultant advised striking her due to her background as a recovering alcoholic. The conversation highlights the jury selection process and the factors considered when evaluating potential jurors. The document is part of a larger court filing in a criminal case.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 85 of 130

The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a Westlaw report concerning a juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms that the report matches the juror's information provided to the firm before voir dire.

1p
House OversightDepositionUnknown

The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respond...

The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.

1p
House OversightDepositionUnknown

The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumpt...

The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumption that the government had also conducted a Google search on a juror. The court questions Brune about why they didn't disclose certain information earlier.

1p
House OversightDepositionUnknown

The witness, Brune, is being questioned about the team members who worked on the Parse matter case. ...

The witness, Brune, is being questioned about the team members who worked on the Parse matter case. Brune confirms the involvement of various attorneys and paralegals, including Melissa Desori, David Elbaum, Brendan Henry, Jenson Smith, Ariel Stoddard, and Nancy Ma. The testimony provides details about the roles of these individuals in the case.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.