deposition: Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 34 of 130
Summary
The witness, Brune, discusses a conversation about Catherine Conrad, a potential juror, and how the jury consultant advised striking her due to her background as a recovering alcoholic. The conversation highlights the jury selection process and the factors considered when evaluating potential jurors. The document is part of a larger court filing in a criminal case.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (6)
Related Documents (6)
deposition: A-5719
The witness discusses a conversation about Catherine Conrad, a potential juror, and how the jury consultant advised striking her due to her background as a recovering alcoholic. The witness also mentions that the potential juror's name matched that of a suspended lawyer, which was considered during the voir dire process.
deposition transcript: A-5735
The witness, Brune, testifies that they were not included in email traffic related to Catherine Conrad and does not recall being made aware of it. The discussion involves a note that prompted additional research and a dispute about the timing of an email sent by Ms. Trzaskoma.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 85 of 130
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a Westlaw report concerning a juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms that the report matches the juror's information provided to the firm before voir dire.
deposition transcript: 1616630
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
deposition transcript: A-5718
The witness discusses their firm's receipt and analysis of juror information and research conducted before voir dire. They confirm having access to a specific 2010 suspension opinion related to Catherine M. Conrad, although there is a dispute about when it was shown to them.
deposition transcript: A-5721
The deposition transcript shows Brune being questioned about their actions during a trial, specifically regarding the discovery of information about a potential juror named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they did not immediately inform the court about the information and did not require anyone to explain its significance to them. The testimony highlights Brune's understanding of the potential significance of the information.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.