The court denied the defendant's request to modify a protective order that governed the use of disco...
Summary
The court denied the defendant's request to modify a protective order that governed the use of discovery materials produced by the government in a criminal case. The court had previously entered the protective order on July 30, 2020, finding good cause existed. The defendant sought to use documents produced in the criminal case for purposes other than the defense of the criminal action.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.
The document is a court filing in a criminal case where the defendant is offering to renounce her fo...
The document is a court filing in a criminal case where the defendant is offering to renounce her foreign citizenship as part of her bail package. The government argues that this offer does not mitigate the risk of flight and is of unclear validity. The court is being asked to consider whether the defendant's offer is sufficient to alter its prior bail determinations.
The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed un...
The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed under temporary seal due to sensitive information. The government is given two days to respond to the proposed redactions. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions an...
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions and some additional ones suggested by the government to protect sensitive information and third-party privacy. The court applies the Lugosch test to justify the redactions, and orders the defendant to file the redacted documents by February 5, 2021.
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.