Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-723House OversightLegal Filing

The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety...

The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-723
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.

Tags

right of access to judicial documentssealing of court documentsmotion for a new trial
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.