deposition transcript: 2684
Summary
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. Mr. Leopold instructs the witness not to answer questions that involve discussions between them, citing protection. The witness ultimately testifies that they have no knowledge of the lawsuit outside of conversations with Mr. Leopold.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Deposition transcript: 2763
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of interactions between their stepfather (Paul) and reporters, as well as their mother's potential cooperation with law enforcement against Epstein. The witness denies knowledge of these events, and their attorney objects to certain questions.
Deposition Transcript: DOJ-OGR-00033084
The witness is questioned about their interactions with the federal prosecutor's office and FBI agents, and their knowledge of certain communications and events. The witness denies having certain information or knowledge about specific events or discussions. The deposition is part of a public records request.
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold ...
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. Mr. Leopold instructs the witness not to answer questions that involve discussions between them, citing protection. The witness ultimately testifies that they have no knowledge of the lawsuit outside of conversations with Mr. Leopold.
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims
The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or w Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition. Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf. Debate over whether attorney‑cli
Courtroom exchange featuring Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein with vague references to surveillance and name‑tag switching
The excerpt contains a disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It hints at someone being searched for and a possible surveillance incident, but provid Witness mentions being aware that 'people were looking for me' without identifying who they were. Reference to a night when the witness and a friend 'switched name tags' – unclear relevance. Repeated
Privileged Discussion Over Potential $50M Lawsuit Against Jeffrey Epstein
The excerpt hints at a lawsuit filed by an individual named Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein for $50 million, but provides no concrete details such as filing dates, co Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion is framed as privileged, limiting disclosure of details. The witness and questioning attorney re
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.