Mr. Leopold
attorney for the witness
Mentioned in 3 documents. Roles: attorney for the witness, The attorney objecting to a question, Individual mentioned in questioning
Mr. Leopold is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
10 sources for document mentions
deposition transcript: 2684
“The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold ”
Deposition transcript: 2763
“The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of interactions between their stepfather (Paul”
Deposition Transcript: DOJ-OGR-00033084
“The witness is questioned about their interactions with the federal prosecutor's office and FBI agen”
Deposition Copy Dispute Between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger
2025-11-11
“The excerpt details a procedural disagreement over copying documents for a deposition, with no menti”
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing
2025-11-11
“The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mention”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 61 documents”
Known Connections (7)
Document Mentions (45)
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold ...
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. Mr. Leopold instructs the witness not to answer questions that involve discussions between them, citing protection. The witness ultimately testifies that they have no knowledge of the lawsuit outside of conversations with Mr. Leopold.
deposition transcript: 2684
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. Mr. Leopold instructs the witness not to answer questions that involve discussions between them, citing protection. The witness ultimately testifies that they have no knowledge of the lawsuit outside of conversations with Mr. Leopold.
Deposition transcript: 2763
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of interactions between their stepfather (Paul) and reporters, as well as their mother's potential cooperation with law enforcement against Epstein. The witness denies knowledge of these events, and their attorney objects to certain questions.
Deposition Transcript: DOJ-OGR-00033084
The witness is questioned about their interactions with the federal prosecutor's office and FBI agents, and their knowledge of certain communications and events. The witness denies having certain information or knowledge about specific events or discussions. The deposition is part of a public records request.
Fragmented House Oversight Transcript with No Substantive Claims
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue from a hearing with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers no actionable leads or novel information about influential actors Contains brief mentions of Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger. References attorney-client privilege objections. No specific misconduct, transactions, or policy issues identified.
Deposition Copy Dispute Between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger
The excerpt details a procedural disagreement over copying documents for a deposition, with no mention of high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers minimal investigati Mr. Leopold requests laser‑color copies of identified documents for the deposition. Mr. Goldberger proposes sending copies to the court reporter instead of handling them directly. Both parties discus
Transcript excerpt showing heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage contains only a brief, uncited dialogue with no names of high‑profile officials, no financial or misconduct details, and no actionable leads. It offers no novel or controversial informatio Shows a tense interaction between two participants in a House Oversight hearing No substantive allegations, dates, transactions, or policy issues are mentioned
Fragmented House Oversight transcript mentions reimbursement by federal prosecutors
The excerpt provides a vague courtroom exchange with no concrete names, dates, or transaction details. It hints at a possible reimbursement from federal prosecutors but lacks specifics needed for acti Witness discusses not spending money and being at a location called "Marshall's" Reference to federal prosecutors informing the witness about a reimbursement Multiple objections by "Mr. Leopold" indi
House Oversight Hearing Transcript Excerpts with Unclear FBI Interaction Claims
The passage contains vague questioning about whether FBI agents communicated with individuals named Marie Villafona, Jeff Sloman, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Herman, but provides no concrete details, dates, Witness repeatedly denies knowledge of any FBI communications with named individuals. Questions focus on potential FBI involvement in reviewing or discussing a draft indictment. No specific dates, do
Heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage records a confrontational dialogue with no concrete allegations, dates, financial details, or links to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond noting a possible Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of lying in a letter to co‑counsel. Both parties exchange threats of sanctions and accusations of obstruction. The exchange occurs during a House Oversight session (docum
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing
The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations of misconduct, offer Mr. Leopold threatens court sanctions if exhibits are removed unmarked. Mr. Tein disputes the claim that exhibits are unmarked. Mr. Goldberger references long‑standing practice without prior disputes
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing questioning Mr. Leopold about alleged drug habit of his twin sister
The passage provides a vague, fragmented exchange with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking any high‑ranking official or powerful entity to misconduct. It lacks a Witness is questioned about a twin sister's alleged drug habit. Accusations of lying about a visit to a crack house in Georgia are raised. Multiple objections are raised by Mr. Leopold, indicating co
Fragmentary House Oversight Transcript with Unclear References
The excerpt consists of disjointed dialogue fragments lacking clear names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It provides no actionable leads, novel information, or connections to high‑r The text appears to be a partial transcript from a House oversight hearing. Mentions a person named 'Mr. Leopold' and a question about 'Wellington' college. No concrete details about financial flows,
Fragmented transcript from House Oversight hearing with unclear references to a person named Jeff and a massage
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue fragments lacking clear names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It provides no actionable leads, novel information, or connections to high‑r Mentions a person named Jeff and a massage context References a Mr. Leopold and a Mr. Tein Appears to be from a House Oversight hearing transcript dated 01/24/23
House Oversight hearing cancellation discussion between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger
The passage records a brief exchange about a cancelled hearing with no concrete details, names, dates, or financial transactions. It mentions only two individuals whose identities and relevance are un Mr. Leopold claims ignorance of why the hearing was cancelled. Mr. Goldberger expresses personal inconvenience over the cancellation. Leopold offers to obtain an affidavit from a Mr. Pincus.
Showing 15 of 45 documents. View all →
This dossier on Mr. Leopold was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.