Skip to content
Case File
d-806House OversightCorrespondence

The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individ...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-806
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Extradition of nationalsFrench nationality lawGhislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightCorrespondenceUnknown

The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion...

The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion for release, written by William Julié, a French lawyer. It analyzes the French Minister of Justice's letter and argues that the key question is whether France can extradite a French national under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, not under French legislation. The document highlights the precedence of international agreements over national legislation according to the French Constitution.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French nationa...

The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.

1p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Memorandum/Opinion: 20-cr-00880-AJN Document 11-02 Filed 03/23/21 Page d31of518

The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters.

1p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Response to government's memorandum: 2016603608

The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion for release, written by William Julié, a French lawyer. It analyzes the French Minister of Justice's letter and argues that the key question is whether France can extradite a French national under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, not under French legislation. The document highlights the precedence of international agreements over national legislation according to the French Constitution.

1p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Legal Memorandum/Expert Opinion: Case 1:04-cr-00320-AJT Document 1033-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 366 of 4

The document is a legal analysis by William Julié, a French lawyer, discussing the extradition laws between France and the USA. It argues that the French government has discretion to extradite its nationals under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, and questions the relevance of the Peterson case as a precedent. The analysis highlights the difference between a judicial decision and a discretionary decision by the French Ministry of Justice in extradition matters.

1p
Dept. of JusticeCorrespondenceUnknown

Memorandum/Opinion Letter: doj-ogr-00020185

The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters. It was written in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the US. The author asserts that the Ministry's position is not supported by law.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.