deposition: A-5709
Summary
The deposition transcript reveals the lawyer's long-standing relationship with Brune, their personal and professional motivations for representing him, and the hierarchy within the law firm Brune & Richard. The lawyer testifies to being the ultimate decision-maker on cases they lead, including this one. The testimony highlights the lawyer's personal connection to Brune and their belief in his innocence.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: 16166201
The deposition transcript details Brune's testimony about their firm's handling of jury selection, their team's responsibilities, and observations of juror behavior during the trial, particularly noting juror Conrad's attentiveness and note-taking.
deposition transcript: 1616630
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cv-00338-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22
The witness, Brune, is being questioned about the team members who worked on the Parse matter case. Brune confirms the involvement of various attorneys and paralegals, including Melissa Desori, David Elbaum, Brendan Henry, Jenson Smith, Ariel Stoddard, and Nancy Ma. The testimony provides details about the roles of these individuals in the case.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308
The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the brief, their level of knowledge regarding juror misconduct, and the editing process. They decided to focus on whether a suspended lawyer and a juror were the same person. The deponent ultimately edited the fact section of the brief.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-10033-PAE Document 61-2
The deposition questions Brune about the success of his law firm, the importance of winning cases, and the content of his biography on the firm's website, highlighting his strategic choices, preparation, and advocacy skills.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-13038
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.